Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
LSB as a standard isn't current and isn't well suited to embedded
anyway. Its putting artifical constraints on the system and with modern
layer technology, would now be better off as its own layer. As such
its time to split it out.
The only part with some (marginal) usage is lsb_release,
which is split from the lsb package into an own lsb-release
package.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
core-image-lsb only gave a warning:
"WARNING: Building libpam but 'pam' isn't in DISTRO_FEATURES,
PAM won't work correctly"
when the proper DISTRO was not set for it.
default choice would be DISTRO = "poky-lsb",
but not necessarily, depending on each custom distro.
This fix will enforce the proper usage of pam
as a distro feature for core-image-lsb by giving
an error instead of just a warning.
Fixes [YOCTO #6073]
Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga <cristian.iorga@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This more accurately represents what this image and packagegroup are
intended to provide (a more complete command-line environment similar
to what you would find on a traditional Linux system), and avoids
confusion with the similarly named core-image-base and
packagegroup-base.
Fixes [YOCTO #2424].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
LSB includes X, and I wouldn't really call this image "basic" or
"foundational" in our terms, so adjust the description to be a bit more
appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Add 'package-management' to IMAGE_FEATURES to make sure that the
packaging data is not removed, as LSB requires a package manager
available.
[YOCTO #4814]
Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Currently hardware codecs are being injected in rather ugly ways and end up
either in no or all images. This adds a dedicated IMAGE_FEATURE for them based
on the MACHINE_HWCODECS variable. We may need to refine this in due course
but this patch at least illustrates the concept.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This provides one package group, packagegroup-core-apps-console, which
is usually brought in by adding "apps-console-core" to IMAGE_FEATURES.
Aside from the naming inconsistencies, this is a group of mostly
unrelated packages, none of which are actually "apps". Handling each
one:
* dbus: should mostly be brought in by package runtime dependencies
* avahi-daemon: if you are using packagegroup-base (as all images that
inherit from core-image do) this is brought in by having "zeroconf" in
DISTRO_FEATURES.
* portmap: not very useful by itself; should be brought in by selecting
NFS server/client through other means.
* psplash (or whatever SPLASH is set to): this has been changed to be
an explicit item "splash" in IMAGE_FEATURES. Since this is a fairly
fundamental feature, a piece of code has been added to automatically
handle this for images still using apps-console-core (and show a
warning).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
"Package group" is a much more appropriate name for these than task,
since we use the word task to describe units of work executed by
BitBake.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Fixes [YOCTO #2227]
I've updated the image descriptions per the bug description.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
|
|
Add DESCRIPTION to each image bb file according to poky reference manual for Hob2 use later.
Signed-off-by: Shane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|