inetutils: Handle rsh, etc more consistently

- We cannot build rsh, rshd, rlogind and rcp on musl.  This is handled
  gracefully in the configure scripts and spelled out with EXTRA_OECONF.
  Expand this to include rexec to cover all of the related functionality.
- Rework adding in the xinetd.d files for these services to only do so
  when we even have the services being built.  This leads to no rsh/rshd
  sub-packages on musl at all.
- If we use the normal alternatives mechanism to allow for this or
  netkit-rsh to provide rsh/rshd functionality we end up with QA issues
  on musl as we have unused ALTERNATIVES logic.  Switch to making use of
  RPROVIDES / RCONFLICTS logic instead and make it match the netkit-rsh
  packaging names.

Cc: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions