diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-execution.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-execution.rst | 761 |
1 files changed, 761 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-execution.rst b/doc/bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-execution.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d58fbb32e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-execution.rst @@ -0,0 +1,761 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-2.5 + +========= +Execution +========= + +| + +The primary purpose for running BitBake is to produce some kind of +output such as a single installable package, a kernel, a software +development kit, or even a full, board-specific bootable Linux image, +complete with bootloader, kernel, and root filesystem. Of course, you +can execute the ``bitbake`` command with options that cause it to +execute single tasks, compile single recipe files, capture or clear +data, or simply return information about the execution environment. + +This chapter describes BitBake's execution process from start to finish +when you use it to create an image. The execution process is launched +using the following command form:: + + $ bitbake target + +For information on +the BitBake command and its options, see ":ref:`The BitBake Command +<bitbake-user-manual-command>`" section. + +.. note:: + + Prior to executing BitBake, you should take advantage of available + parallel thread execution on your build host by setting the + :term:`BB_NUMBER_THREADS` variable in + your project's ``local.conf`` configuration file. + + A common method to determine this value for your build host is to run + the following:: + + $ grep processor /proc/cpuinfo + + This command returns + the number of processors, which takes into account hyper-threading. + Thus, a quad-core build host with hyper-threading most likely shows + eight processors, which is the value you would then assign to + :term:`BB_NUMBER_THREADS`. + + A possibly simpler solution is that some Linux distributions (e.g. + Debian and Ubuntu) provide the ``ncpus`` command. + +Parsing the Base Configuration Metadata +======================================= + +The first thing BitBake does is parse base configuration metadata. Base +configuration metadata consists of your project's ``bblayers.conf`` file +to determine what layers BitBake needs to recognize, all necessary +``layer.conf`` files (one from each layer), and ``bitbake.conf``. The +data itself is of various types: + +- **Recipes:** Details about particular pieces of software. + +- **Class Data:** An abstraction of common build information (e.g. how to + build a Linux kernel). + +- **Configuration Data:** Machine-specific settings, policy decisions, + and so forth. Configuration data acts as the glue to bind everything + together. + +The ``layer.conf`` files are used to construct key variables such as +:term:`BBPATH` and :term:`BBFILES`. +:term:`BBPATH` is used to search for configuration and class files under the +``conf`` and ``classes`` directories, respectively. :term:`BBFILES` is used +to locate both recipe and recipe append files (``.bb`` and +``.bbappend``). If there is no ``bblayers.conf`` file, it is assumed the +user has set the :term:`BBPATH` and :term:`BBFILES` directly in the environment. + +Next, the ``bitbake.conf`` file is located using the :term:`BBPATH` variable +that was just constructed. The ``bitbake.conf`` file may also include +other configuration files using the ``include`` or ``require`` +directives. + +Prior to parsing configuration files, BitBake looks at certain +variables, including: + +- :term:`BB_ENV_PASSTHROUGH` +- :term:`BB_ENV_PASSTHROUGH_ADDITIONS` +- :term:`BB_PRESERVE_ENV` +- :term:`BB_ORIGENV` +- :term:`BITBAKE_UI` + +The first four variables in this list relate to how BitBake treats shell +environment variables during task execution. By default, BitBake cleans +the environment variables and provides tight control over the shell +execution environment. However, through the use of these first four +variables, you can apply your control regarding the environment +variables allowed to be used by BitBake in the shell during execution of +tasks. See the +":ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-metadata:Passing Information Into the Build Task Environment`" +section and the information about these variables in the variable +glossary for more information on how they work and on how to use them. + +The base configuration metadata is global and therefore affects all +recipes and tasks that are executed. + +BitBake first searches the current working directory for an optional +``conf/bblayers.conf`` configuration file. This file is expected to +contain a :term:`BBLAYERS` variable that is a +space-delimited list of 'layer' directories. Recall that if BitBake +cannot find a ``bblayers.conf`` file, then it is assumed the user has +set the :term:`BBPATH` and :term:`BBFILES` variables directly in the +environment. + +For each directory (layer) in this list, a ``conf/layer.conf`` file is +located and parsed with the :term:`LAYERDIR` variable +being set to the directory where the layer was found. The idea is these +files automatically set up :term:`BBPATH` and other +variables correctly for a given build directory. + +BitBake then expects to find the ``conf/bitbake.conf`` file somewhere in +the user-specified :term:`BBPATH`. That configuration file generally has +include directives to pull in any other metadata such as files specific +to the architecture, the machine, the local environment, and so forth. + +Only variable definitions and include directives are allowed in BitBake +``.conf`` files. Some variables directly influence BitBake's behavior. +These variables might have been set from the environment depending on +the environment variables previously mentioned or set in the +configuration files. The ":ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-ref-variables:Variables Glossary`" +chapter presents a full list of +variables. + +After parsing configuration files, BitBake uses its rudimentary +inheritance mechanism, which is through class files, to inherit some +standard classes. BitBake parses a class when the inherit directive +responsible for getting that class is encountered. + +The ``base.bbclass`` file is always included. Other classes that are +specified in the configuration using the +:term:`INHERIT` variable are also included. BitBake +searches for class files in a ``classes`` subdirectory under the paths +in :term:`BBPATH` in the same way as configuration files. + +A good way to get an idea of the configuration files and the class files +used in your execution environment is to run the following BitBake +command:: + + $ bitbake -e > mybb.log + +Examining the top of the ``mybb.log`` +shows you the many configuration files and class files used in your +execution environment. + +.. note:: + + You need to be aware of how BitBake parses curly braces. If a recipe + uses a closing curly brace within the function and the character has + no leading spaces, BitBake produces a parsing error. If you use a + pair of curly braces in a shell function, the closing curly brace + must not be located at the start of the line without leading spaces. + + Here is an example that causes BitBake to produce a parsing error:: + + fakeroot create_shar() { + cat << "EOF" > ${SDK_DEPLOY}/${TOOLCHAIN_OUTPUTNAME}.sh + usage() + { + echo "test" + ###### The following "}" at the start of the line causes a parsing error ###### + } + EOF + } + + Writing the recipe this way avoids the error: + fakeroot create_shar() { + cat << "EOF" > ${SDK_DEPLOY}/${TOOLCHAIN_OUTPUTNAME}.sh + usage() + { + echo "test" + ###### The following "}" with a leading space at the start of the line avoids the error ###### + } + EOF + } + +Locating and Parsing Recipes +============================ + +During the configuration phase, BitBake will have set +:term:`BBFILES`. BitBake now uses it to construct a +list of recipes to parse, along with any append files (``.bbappend``) to +apply. :term:`BBFILES` is a space-separated list of available files and +supports wildcards. An example would be:: + + BBFILES = "/path/to/bbfiles/*.bb /path/to/appends/*.bbappend" + +BitBake parses each +recipe and append file located with :term:`BBFILES` and stores the values of +various variables into the datastore. + +.. note:: + + Append files are applied in the order they are encountered in BBFILES. + +For each file, a fresh copy of the base configuration is made, then the +recipe is parsed line by line. Any inherit statements cause BitBake to +find and then parse class files (``.bbclass``) using +:term:`BBPATH` as the search path. Finally, BitBake +parses in order any append files found in :term:`BBFILES`. + +One common convention is to use the recipe filename to define pieces of +metadata. For example, in ``bitbake.conf`` the recipe name and version +are used to set the variables :term:`PN` and +:term:`PV`:: + + PN = "${@bb.parse.vars_from_file(d.getVar('FILE', False),d)[0] or 'defaultpkgname'}" + PV = "${@bb.parse.vars_from_file(d.getVar('FILE', False),d)[1] or '1.0'}" + +In this example, a recipe called "something_1.2.3.bb" would set +:term:`PN` to "something" and :term:`PV` to "1.2.3". + +By the time parsing is complete for a recipe, BitBake has a list of +tasks that the recipe defines and a set of data consisting of keys and +values as well as dependency information about the tasks. + +BitBake does not need all of this information. It only needs a small +subset of the information to make decisions about the recipe. +Consequently, BitBake caches the values in which it is interested and +does not store the rest of the information. Experience has shown it is +faster to re-parse the metadata than to try and write it out to the disk +and then reload it. + +Where possible, subsequent BitBake commands reuse this cache of recipe +information. The validity of this cache is determined by first computing +a checksum of the base configuration data (see +:term:`BB_HASHCONFIG_IGNORE_VARS`) and +then checking if the checksum matches. If that checksum matches what is +in the cache and the recipe and class files have not changed, BitBake is +able to use the cache. BitBake then reloads the cached information about +the recipe instead of reparsing it from scratch. + +Recipe file collections exist to allow the user to have multiple +repositories of ``.bb`` files that contain the same exact package. For +example, one could easily use them to make one's own local copy of an +upstream repository, but with custom modifications that one does not +want upstream. Here is an example:: + + BBFILES = "/stuff/openembedded/*/*.bb /stuff/openembedded.modified/*/*.bb" + BBFILE_COLLECTIONS = "upstream local" + BBFILE_PATTERN_upstream = "^/stuff/openembedded/" + BBFILE_PATTERN_local = "^/stuff/openembedded.modified/" + BBFILE_PRIORITY_upstream = "5" + BBFILE_PRIORITY_local = "10" + +.. note:: + + The layers mechanism is now the preferred method of collecting code. + While the collections code remains, its main use is to set layer + priorities and to deal with overlap (conflicts) between layers. + +.. _bb-bitbake-providers: + +Providers +========= + +Assuming BitBake has been instructed to execute a target and that all +the recipe files have been parsed, BitBake starts to figure out how to +build the target. BitBake looks through the :term:`PROVIDES` list for each +of the recipes. A :term:`PROVIDES` list is the list of names by which the +recipe can be known. Each recipe's :term:`PROVIDES` list is created +implicitly through the recipe's :term:`PN` variable and +explicitly through the recipe's :term:`PROVIDES` +variable, which is optional. + +When a recipe uses :term:`PROVIDES`, that recipe's functionality can be +found under an alternative name or names other than the implicit :term:`PN` +name. As an example, suppose a recipe named ``keyboard_1.0.bb`` +contained the following:: + + PROVIDES += "fullkeyboard" + +The :term:`PROVIDES` +list for this recipe becomes "keyboard", which is implicit, and +"fullkeyboard", which is explicit. Consequently, the functionality found +in ``keyboard_1.0.bb`` can be found under two different names. + +.. _bb-bitbake-preferences: + +Preferences +=========== + +The :term:`PROVIDES` list is only part of the solution for figuring out a +target's recipes. Because targets might have multiple providers, BitBake +needs to prioritize providers by determining provider preferences. + +A common example in which a target has multiple providers is +"virtual/kernel", which is on the :term:`PROVIDES` list for each kernel +recipe. Each machine often selects the best kernel provider by using a +line similar to the following in the machine configuration file:: + + PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-yocto" + +The default :term:`PREFERRED_PROVIDER` is the provider +with the same name as the target. BitBake iterates through each target +it needs to build and resolves them and their dependencies using this +process. + +Understanding how providers are chosen is made complicated by the fact +that multiple versions might exist for a given provider. BitBake +defaults to the highest version of a provider. Version comparisons are +made using the same method as Debian. You can use the +:term:`PREFERRED_VERSION` variable to +specify a particular version. You can influence the order by using the +:term:`DEFAULT_PREFERENCE` variable. + +By default, files have a preference of "0". Setting +:term:`DEFAULT_PREFERENCE` to "-1" makes the recipe unlikely to be used +unless it is explicitly referenced. Setting :term:`DEFAULT_PREFERENCE` to +"1" makes it likely the recipe is used. :term:`PREFERRED_VERSION` overrides +any :term:`DEFAULT_PREFERENCE` setting. :term:`DEFAULT_PREFERENCE` is often used +to mark newer and more experimental recipe versions until they have +undergone sufficient testing to be considered stable. + +When there are multiple "versions" of a given recipe, BitBake defaults +to selecting the most recent version, unless otherwise specified. If the +recipe in question has a +:term:`DEFAULT_PREFERENCE` set lower than +the other recipes (default is 0), then it will not be selected. This +allows the person or persons maintaining the repository of recipe files +to specify their preference for the default selected version. +Additionally, the user can specify their preferred version. + +If the first recipe is named ``a_1.1.bb``, then the +:term:`PN` variable will be set to "a", and the +:term:`PV` variable will be set to 1.1. + +Thus, if a recipe named ``a_1.2.bb`` exists, BitBake will choose 1.2 by +default. However, if you define the following variable in a ``.conf`` +file that BitBake parses, you can change that preference:: + + PREFERRED_VERSION_a = "1.1" + +.. note:: + + It is common for a recipe to provide two versions -- a stable, + numbered (and preferred) version, and a version that is automatically + checked out from a source code repository that is considered more + "bleeding edge" but can be selected only explicitly. + + For example, in the OpenEmbedded codebase, there is a standard, + versioned recipe file for BusyBox, ``busybox_1.22.1.bb``, but there + is also a Git-based version, ``busybox_git.bb``, which explicitly + contains the line :: + + DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" + + to ensure that the + numbered, stable version is always preferred unless the developer + selects otherwise. + +.. _bb-bitbake-dependencies: + +Dependencies +============ + +Each target BitBake builds consists of multiple tasks such as ``fetch``, +``unpack``, ``patch``, ``configure``, and ``compile``. For best +performance on multi-core systems, BitBake considers each task as an +independent entity with its own set of dependencies. + +Dependencies are defined through several variables. You can find +information about variables BitBake uses in the +:doc:`bitbake-user-manual-ref-variables` near the end of this manual. At a +basic level, it is sufficient to know that BitBake uses the +:term:`DEPENDS` and +:term:`RDEPENDS` variables when calculating +dependencies. + +For more information on how BitBake handles dependencies, see the +:ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-metadata:Dependencies` +section. + +.. _ref-bitbake-tasklist: + +The Task List +============= + +Based on the generated list of providers and the dependency information, +BitBake can now calculate exactly what tasks it needs to run and in what +order it needs to run them. The +:ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-execution:executing tasks` +section has more information on how BitBake chooses which task to +execute next. + +The build now starts with BitBake forking off threads up to the limit +set in the :term:`BB_NUMBER_THREADS` +variable. BitBake continues to fork threads as long as there are tasks +ready to run, those tasks have all their dependencies met, and the +thread threshold has not been exceeded. + +It is worth noting that you can greatly speed up the build time by +properly setting the :term:`BB_NUMBER_THREADS` variable. + +As each task completes, a timestamp is written to the directory +specified by the :term:`STAMP` variable. On subsequent +runs, BitBake looks in the build directory within ``tmp/stamps`` and +does not rerun tasks that are already completed unless a timestamp is +found to be invalid. Currently, invalid timestamps are only considered +on a per recipe file basis. So, for example, if the configure stamp has +a timestamp greater than the compile timestamp for a given target, then +the compile task would rerun. Running the compile task again, however, +has no effect on other providers that depend on that target. + +The exact format of the stamps is partly configurable. In modern +versions of BitBake, a hash is appended to the stamp so that if the +configuration changes, the stamp becomes invalid and the task is +automatically rerun. This hash, or signature used, is governed by the +signature policy that is configured (see the +:ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-execution:checksums (signatures)` +section for information). It is also +possible to append extra metadata to the stamp using the +``[stamp-extra-info]`` task flag. For example, OpenEmbedded uses this +flag to make some tasks machine-specific. + +.. note:: + + Some tasks are marked as "nostamp" tasks. No timestamp file is + created when these tasks are run. Consequently, "nostamp" tasks are + always rerun. + +For more information on tasks, see the +:ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-metadata:tasks` section. + +Executing Tasks +=============== + +Tasks can be either a shell task or a Python task. For shell tasks, +BitBake writes a shell script to +``${``\ :term:`T`\ ``}/run.do_taskname.pid`` and then +executes the script. The generated shell script contains all the +exported variables, and the shell functions with all variables expanded. +Output from the shell script goes to the file +``${``\ :term:`T`\ ``}/log.do_taskname.pid``. Looking at the expanded shell functions in +the run file and the output in the log files is a useful debugging +technique. + +For Python tasks, BitBake executes the task internally and logs +information to the controlling terminal. Future versions of BitBake will +write the functions to files similar to the way shell tasks are handled. +Logging will be handled in a way similar to shell tasks as well. + +The order in which BitBake runs the tasks is controlled by its task +scheduler. It is possible to configure the scheduler and define custom +implementations for specific use cases. For more information, see these +variables that control the behavior: + +- :term:`BB_SCHEDULER` + +- :term:`BB_SCHEDULERS` + +It is possible to have functions run before and after a task's main +function. This is done using the ``[prefuncs]`` and ``[postfuncs]`` +flags of the task that lists the functions to run. + +.. _checksums: + +Checksums (Signatures) +====================== + +A checksum is a unique signature of a task's inputs. The signature of a +task can be used to determine if a task needs to be run. Because it is a +change in a task's inputs that triggers running the task, BitBake needs +to detect all the inputs to a given task. For shell tasks, this turns +out to be fairly easy because BitBake generates a "run" shell script for +each task and it is possible to create a checksum that gives you a good +idea of when the task's data changes. + +To complicate the problem, some things should not be included in the +checksum. First, there is the actual specific build path of a given task +- the working directory. It does not matter if the working directory +changes because it should not affect the output for target packages. The +simplistic approach for excluding the working directory is to set it to +some fixed value and create the checksum for the "run" script. BitBake +goes one step better and uses the +:term:`BB_BASEHASH_IGNORE_VARS` variable +to define a list of variables that should never be included when +generating the signatures. + +Another problem results from the "run" scripts containing functions that +might or might not get called. The incremental build solution contains +code that figures out dependencies between shell functions. This code is +used to prune the "run" scripts down to the minimum set, thereby +alleviating this problem and making the "run" scripts much more readable +as a bonus. + +So far we have solutions for shell scripts. What about Python tasks? The +same approach applies even though these tasks are more difficult. The +process needs to figure out what variables a Python function accesses +and what functions it calls. Again, the incremental build solution +contains code that first figures out the variable and function +dependencies, and then creates a checksum for the data used as the input +to the task. + +Like the working directory case, situations exist where dependencies +should be ignored. For these cases, you can instruct the build process +to ignore a dependency by using a line like the following:: + + PACKAGE_ARCHS[vardepsexclude] = "MACHINE" + +This example ensures that the +``PACKAGE_ARCHS`` variable does not depend on the value of ``MACHINE``, +even if it does reference it. + +Equally, there are cases where we need to add dependencies BitBake is +not able to find. You can accomplish this by using a line like the +following:: + + PACKAGE_ARCHS[vardeps] = "MACHINE" + +This example explicitly +adds the ``MACHINE`` variable as a dependency for ``PACKAGE_ARCHS``. + +Consider a case with in-line Python, for example, where BitBake is not +able to figure out dependencies. When running in debug mode (i.e. using +``-DDD``), BitBake produces output when it discovers something for which +it cannot figure out dependencies. + +Thus far, this section has limited discussion to the direct inputs into +a task. Information based on direct inputs is referred to as the +"basehash" in the code. However, there is still the question of a task's +indirect inputs --- the things that were already built and present in the +build directory. The checksum (or signature) for a particular task needs +to add the hashes of all the tasks on which the particular task depends. +Choosing which dependencies to add is a policy decision. However, the +effect is to generate a master checksum that combines the basehash and +the hashes of the task's dependencies. + +At the code level, there are a variety of ways both the basehash and the +dependent task hashes can be influenced. Within the BitBake +configuration file, we can give BitBake some extra information to help +it construct the basehash. The following statement effectively results +in a list of global variable dependency excludes --- variables never +included in any checksum. This example uses variables from OpenEmbedded +to help illustrate the concept:: + + BB_BASEHASH_IGNORE_VARS ?= "TMPDIR FILE PATH PWD BB_TASKHASH BBPATH DL_DIR \ + SSTATE_DIR THISDIR FILESEXTRAPATHS FILE_DIRNAME HOME LOGNAME SHELL \ + USER FILESPATH STAGING_DIR_HOST STAGING_DIR_TARGET COREBASE PRSERV_HOST \ + PRSERV_DUMPDIR PRSERV_DUMPFILE PRSERV_LOCKDOWN PARALLEL_MAKE \ + CCACHE_DIR EXTERNAL_TOOLCHAIN CCACHE CCACHE_DISABLE LICENSE_PATH SDKPKGSUFFIX" + +The previous example excludes the work directory, which is part of +``TMPDIR``. + +The rules for deciding which hashes of dependent tasks to include +through dependency chains are more complex and are generally +accomplished with a Python function. The code in +``meta/lib/oe/sstatesig.py`` shows two examples of this and also +illustrates how you can insert your own policy into the system if so +desired. This file defines the basic signature generator +OpenEmbedded-Core uses: "OEBasicHash". By default, there +is a dummy "noop" signature handler enabled in BitBake. This means that +behavior is unchanged from previous versions. ``OE-Core`` uses the +"OEBasicHash" signature handler by default through this setting in the +``bitbake.conf`` file:: + + BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER ?= "OEBasicHash" + +The main feature of the "OEBasicHash" :term:`BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER` is that +it adds the task hash to the stamp files. Thanks to this, any metadata +change will change the task hash, automatically causing the task to be run +again. This removes the need to bump :term:`PR` values, and changes to +metadata automatically ripple across the build. + +It is also worth noting that the end result of signature +generators is to make some dependency and hash information available to +the build. This information includes: + +- ``BB_BASEHASH_task-``\ *taskname*: The base hashes for each task in the + recipe. + +- ``BB_BASEHASH_``\ *filename:taskname*: The base hashes for each + dependent task. + +- :term:`BB_TASKHASH`: The hash of the currently running task. + +It is worth noting that BitBake's "-S" option lets you debug BitBake's +processing of signatures. The options passed to -S allow different +debugging modes to be used, either using BitBake's own debug functions +or possibly those defined in the metadata/signature handler itself. The +simplest parameter to pass is "none", which causes a set of signature +information to be written out into ``STAMPS_DIR`` corresponding to the +targets specified. The other currently available parameter is +"printdiff", which causes BitBake to try to establish the most recent +signature match it can (e.g. in the sstate cache) and then run +compare the matched signatures to determine the stamps and delta +where these two stamp trees diverge. This can be used to determine why +tasks need to be re-run in situations where that is not expected. + +.. note:: + + It is likely that future versions of BitBake will provide other + signature handlers triggered through additional "-S" parameters. + +You can find more information on checksum metadata in the +:ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-metadata:task checksums and setscene` +section. + +Setscene +======== + +The setscene process enables BitBake to handle "pre-built" artifacts. +The ability to handle and reuse these artifacts allows BitBake the +luxury of not having to build something from scratch every time. +Instead, BitBake can use, when possible, existing build artifacts. + +BitBake needs to have reliable data indicating whether or not an +artifact is compatible. Signatures, described in the previous section, +provide an ideal way of representing whether an artifact is compatible. +If a signature is the same, an object can be reused. + +If an object can be reused, the problem then becomes how to replace a +given task or set of tasks with the pre-built artifact. BitBake solves +the problem with the "setscene" process. + +When BitBake is asked to build a given target, before building anything, +it first asks whether cached information is available for any of the +targets it's building, or any of the intermediate targets. If cached +information is available, BitBake uses this information instead of +running the main tasks. + +BitBake first calls the function defined by the +:term:`BB_HASHCHECK_FUNCTION` variable +with a list of tasks and corresponding hashes it wants to build. This +function is designed to be fast and returns a list of the tasks for +which it believes in can obtain artifacts. + +Next, for each of the tasks that were returned as possibilities, BitBake +executes a setscene version of the task that the possible artifact +covers. Setscene versions of a task have the string "_setscene" appended +to the task name. So, for example, the task with the name ``xxx`` has a +setscene task named ``xxx_setscene``. The setscene version of the task +executes and provides the necessary artifacts returning either success +or failure. + +As previously mentioned, an artifact can cover more than one task. For +example, it is pointless to obtain a compiler if you already have the +compiled binary. To handle this, BitBake calls the +:term:`BB_SETSCENE_DEPVALID` function for +each successful setscene task to know whether or not it needs to obtain +the dependencies of that task. + +You can find more information on setscene metadata in the +:ref:`bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-metadata:task checksums and setscene` +section. + +Logging +======= + +In addition to the standard command line option to control how verbose +builds are when execute, bitbake also supports user defined +configuration of the `Python +logging <https://docs.python.org/3/library/logging.html>`__ facilities +through the :term:`BB_LOGCONFIG` variable. This +variable defines a JSON or YAML `logging +configuration <https://docs.python.org/3/library/logging.config.html>`__ +that will be intelligently merged into the default configuration. The +logging configuration is merged using the following rules: + +- The user defined configuration will completely replace the default + configuration if top level key ``bitbake_merge`` is set to the value + ``False``. In this case, all other rules are ignored. + +- The user configuration must have a top level ``version`` which must + match the value of the default configuration. + +- Any keys defined in the ``handlers``, ``formatters``, or ``filters``, + will be merged into the same section in the default configuration, + with the user specified keys taking replacing a default one if there + is a conflict. In practice, this means that if both the default + configuration and user configuration specify a handler named + ``myhandler``, the user defined one will replace the default. To + prevent the user from inadvertently replacing a default handler, + formatter, or filter, all of the default ones are named with a prefix + of "``BitBake.``" + +- If a logger is defined by the user with the key ``bitbake_merge`` set + to ``False``, that logger will be completely replaced by user + configuration. In this case, no other rules will apply to that + logger. + +- All user defined ``filter`` and ``handlers`` properties for a given + logger will be merged with corresponding properties from the default + logger. For example, if the user configuration adds a filter called + ``myFilter`` to the ``BitBake.SigGen``, and the default configuration + adds a filter called ``BitBake.defaultFilter``, both filters will be + applied to the logger + +As a first example, you can create a ``hashequiv.json`` user logging +configuration file to log all Hash Equivalence related messages of ``VERBOSE`` +or higher priority to a file called ``hashequiv.log``:: + + { + "version": 1, + "handlers": { + "autobuilderlog": { + "class": "logging.FileHandler", + "formatter": "logfileFormatter", + "level": "DEBUG", + "filename": "hashequiv.log", + "mode": "w" + } + }, + "formatters": { + "logfileFormatter": { + "format": "%(name)s: %(levelname)s: %(message)s" + } + }, + "loggers": { + "BitBake.SigGen.HashEquiv": { + "level": "VERBOSE", + "handlers": ["autobuilderlog"] + }, + "BitBake.RunQueue.HashEquiv": { + "level": "VERBOSE", + "handlers": ["autobuilderlog"] + } + } + } + +Then set the :term:`BB_LOGCONFIG` variable in ``conf/local.conf``:: + + BB_LOGCONFIG = "hashequiv.json" + +Another example is this ``warn.json`` file to log all ``WARNING`` and +higher priority messages to a ``warn.log`` file:: + + { + "version": 1, + "formatters": { + "warnlogFormatter": { + "()": "bb.msg.BBLogFormatter", + "format": "%(levelname)s: %(message)s" + } + }, + + "handlers": { + "warnlog": { + "class": "logging.FileHandler", + "formatter": "warnlogFormatter", + "level": "WARNING", + "filename": "warn.log" + } + }, + + "loggers": { + "BitBake": { + "handlers": ["warnlog"] + } + }, + + "@disable_existing_loggers": false + } + +Note that BitBake's helper classes for structured logging are implemented in +``lib/bb/msg.py``. |