blob: ff64f58c9cc6cf50387864a1cc88c550e47034b0 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
|
From 6e2f78948403a4cce45b9e34311c9577c624f066 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:51:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] core: set fs.file-max sysctl to LONG_MAX rather than
ULONG_MAX
Since kernel 5.2 the kernel thankfully returns proper errors when we
write a value out of range to the sysctl. Which however breaks writing
ULONG_MAX to request the maximum value. Hence let's write the new
maximum value instead, LONG_MAX.
/cc @brauner
Fixes: #12803
Upstream-Status: Backport
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
---
src/core/main.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/main.c b/src/core/main.c
index b33ea1b5b5..e7f51815f0 100644
--- a/src/core/main.c
+++ b/src/core/main.c
@@ -1245,9 +1245,9 @@ static void bump_file_max_and_nr_open(void) {
#endif
#if BUMP_PROC_SYS_FS_FILE_MAX
- /* I so wanted to use STRINGIFY(ULONG_MAX) here, but alas we can't as glibc/gcc define that as
- * "(0x7fffffffffffffffL * 2UL + 1UL)". Seriously. 😢 */
- if (asprintf(&t, "%lu\n", ULONG_MAX) < 0) {
+ /* The maximum the kernel allows for this since 5.2 is LONG_MAX, use that. (Previously thing where
+ * different but the operation would fail silently.) */
+ if (asprintf(&t, "%li\n", LONG_MAX) < 0) {
log_oom();
return;
}
|
