| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
There was a regression in this functionality that went unnoticed
due to lack of tests.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
So that they're reported correctly when checking 'universe' for
latest upstream versions.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
These recipes should be excluded from target 'world' because these are
just intended to be used internally by oe-selftest (devtool, recipetool, etc.)
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
* Use a more real-world test of a recipe pointing to a remote file
* The cleanup tracking / teardown commands need to be added towards the
top, or they won't have the desired effect of cleaning up if the test
fails.
* Check that a versioned subdirectory gets renamed to match the new
version
* Ensure the recipe contents gets changed as we expect it to
* Check that the recipe directory is deleted by devtool reset at the end
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
Alexander Kanavin
Alexander Kanavin
Leonardo Sandoval
Paul Eggleton