summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py')
-rw-r--r--meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py48
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
index 0b454714e9..ad952c004b 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
@@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
+#
+# Copyright OpenEmbedded Contributors
+#
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
+#
+
from oeqa.selftest.case import OESelftestTestCase
-from oeqa.utils.commands import runCmd, bitbake, get_bb_var, get_bb_vars
-from oeqa.utils.decorators import testcase
-from oeqa.utils.ftools import write_file
-from oeqa.core.decorator.oeid import OETestID
import oe.recipeutils
class Distrodata(OESelftestTestCase):
- @OETestID(1902)
def test_checkpkg(self):
"""
Summary: Test that upstream version checks do not regress
@@ -16,7 +17,7 @@ class Distrodata(OESelftestTestCase):
Product: oe-core
Author: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
"""
- feature = 'LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST += " commercial"\n'
+ feature = 'LICENSE_FLAGS_ACCEPTED += " commercial"\n'
self.write_config(feature)
pkgs = oe.recipeutils.get_recipe_upgrade_status()
@@ -40,19 +41,28 @@ but their recipes claim otherwise by setting UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN. Please re
def test_maintainers(self):
"""
- Summary: Test that oe-core recipes have a maintainer
+ Summary: Test that oe-core recipes have a maintainer and entries in maintainers list have a recipe
Expected: All oe-core recipes (except a few special static/testing ones) should have a maintainer listed in maintainers.inc file.
+ Expected: All entries in maintainers list should have a recipe file that matches them
Product: oe-core
Author: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
"""
def is_exception(pkg):
- exceptions = ["packagegroup-", "initramfs-", "systemd-machine-units", "target-sdk-provides-dummy"]
+ exceptions = ["packagegroup-",]
for i in exceptions:
if i in pkg:
return True
return False
- feature = 'require conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc\n'
+ def is_maintainer_exception(entry):
+ exceptions = ["musl", "newlib", "linux-yocto", "linux-dummy", "mesa-gl", "libgfortran", "libx11-compose-data",
+ "cve-update-nvd2-native",]
+ for i in exceptions:
+ if i in entry:
+ return True
+ return False
+
+ feature = 'require conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc\nLICENSE_FLAGS_ACCEPTED += " commercial"\nPARSE_ALL_RECIPES = "1"\nPACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_ipk package_deb package_rpm"\n'
self.write_config(feature)
with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
@@ -60,6 +70,11 @@ but their recipes claim otherwise by setting UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN. Please re
with_maintainer_list = []
no_maintainer_list = []
+
+ missing_recipes = []
+ recipes = []
+ prefix = "RECIPE_MAINTAINER:pn-"
+
# We could have used all_recipes() here, but this method will find
# every recipe if we ever move to setting RECIPE_MAINTAINER in recipe files
# instead of maintainers.inc
@@ -69,6 +84,7 @@ but their recipes claim otherwise by setting UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN. Please re
continue
rd = tinfoil.parse_recipe_file(fn, appends=False)
pn = rd.getVar('PN')
+ recipes.append(pn)
if is_exception(pn):
continue
if rd.getVar('RECIPE_MAINTAINER'):
@@ -76,6 +92,15 @@ but their recipes claim otherwise by setting UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN. Please re
else:
no_maintainer_list.append((pn, fn))
+ maintainers = tinfoil.config_data.keys()
+ for key in maintainers:
+ if key.startswith(prefix):
+ recipe = tinfoil.config_data.expand(key[len(prefix):])
+ if is_maintainer_exception(recipe):
+ continue
+ if recipe not in recipes:
+ missing_recipes.append(recipe)
+
if no_maintainer_list:
self.fail("""
The following recipes do not have a maintainer assigned to them. Please add an entry to meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc file.
@@ -85,3 +110,8 @@ The following recipes do not have a maintainer assigned to them. Please add an e
self.fail("""
The list of oe-core recipes with maintainers is empty. This may indicate that the test has regressed and needs fixing.
""")
+
+ if missing_recipes:
+ self.fail("""
+Unable to find recipes for the following entries in maintainers.inc:
+""" + "\n".join(['%s' % i for i in missing_recipes]))