| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
These test recipes shouldn't be built as part of world builds. Some recent
changes are exposing issues from this so exclude them.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
In commit ceda3238 (meta/meta-selftest/meta-skeleton: Update LICENSE
variable to use SPDX license identifiers) all LICENSE variables were
updated to only use SPDX license identifiers.
This does the same for comments and other variables where it is
appropriate to use the official SPDX license identifiers. There are
still references to, e.g., "GPLv3", but they are then typically in
descriptive text where they refer to the license in a generic sense.
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
handling changes
With the separate of the "-only" and "-or-later" licenses, we need to
update the tests to match the messages now given in the output.
Also use a mix of canonicalised and non-canonlised names in the
reference recipes to help test those cases and ensure coverage.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Suggested-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@streamunlimited.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
One bug went unnoticed without these selftests: an INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE
with a non-SPDX license for a package with that non-SPDX license wasn't
enforcing the denial of build for said package. See
4b6ce4604cc15e289a48f8586d58a101b7a70b52 ("meta: license: fix non-SPDX
license being removed from INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE")
While adding a test for that particular case, let's add a few more so
that we cover a handful more use cases of INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@streamunlimited.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
Richard Purdie
Peter Kjellerstedt
Quentin Schulz