path: root/README.LSB
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Remove LSB supportAdrian Bunk2019-08-291-29/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | LSB as a standard isn't current and isn't well suited to embedded anyway. Its putting artifical constraints on the system and with modern layer technology, would now be better off as its own layer. As such its time to split it out. The only part with some (marginal) usage is lsb_release, which is split from the lsb package into an own lsb-release package. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* packagegroup-core-lsb: remove GTK+Ross Burton2019-07-101-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | GTK+ 2 is being removed from oe-core, so remove it from the oe-core LSB packagegroup. Also document the fact that GTK+ 2 is no longer part of the LSB packagegroup, and point to meta-oe for the recipe if required. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* pax: remove the recipeAlexander Kanavin2018-02-241-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The situation with pax (vs. tar and cpio) is perfectly described here: https://xkcd.com/927/ The only reason pax is still around, kind of, is because both POSIX and LSB mandate it. Outside of those documents, it's not used by anyone. Meanwhile, the upstream URI we've been taking it from went down, and rather than seek an alternative source, I just went ahead and removed the recipe. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
* README.LSB: describe oe-core's deviations from the LSB specAlexander Kanavin2017-06-281-0/+25
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>