| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Make this consistent with "devtool add" so that the user knows where to
find the new recipe.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
The PR value should be reset to the default when upgrading, so we need
to drop it from the newly created file.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
We aren't modifying the datastore copy here, so we don't need a copy at
all.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Fix several issues when extracting the new version source over the top
of the old one (when the recipe is not fetching from a git repo):
* Delete the old source first so we ensure files deleted in the new
version are deleted. This also has the side-effect of fixing any
issues where files aren't marked writeable in the old source and thus
overwriting them failed (harfbuzz 1.1.3 contains such files).
* Fix incorrect variable name in abspath statement that made it a no-op
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
When we do an upgrade from one tarball version to another we want to:
1) Check out the old version as a new branch
2) Record the changes between the old and new versions as a commit
3) Check out the old version with patches applied
4) Rebase that onto the new branch
Where we went wrong was step #1 where instead we checked out the old
version with patches applied as the new branch, which meant the rebase
didn't do anything and any changes made by the patches to files still in
the new version were wiped out.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If the actual value of PV isn't in the name of the recipe (for example,
a git or svn recipe) there's no point trying to rename it. Additionally,
we already have the original filename, there's no need to guess it -
just pass it in.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
We were trying to move this from the current directory instead of the
path. Let's just use shutil.move() instead of shelling out to mv.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
For recipes that specify SRCREV, the code here wasn't quite doing the
right thing. If the recipe has a SRCREV then that needs changing on
upgrade, so ensure that the user specifies it. If it doesn't, then it'll
be "INVALID" not None since the former is the actual default, so handle
that properly as well. Additionally an unset variable was being
erroneously passed when raising the error about the version being the
same leading to a traceback, so fix that as well.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
The recipename argument to devtool upgrade specifies an existing recipe,
so by definition the name will be valid (or it won't exist) - we don't
need to validate it ourselves, that's only needed for situations like in
devtool add where we're creating a new recipe.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Make devtool upgrade consistent with devtool add/modify in defaulting to
sources/<recipename> under the workspace if no source tree path is
specified.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If you for example ran devtool modify virtual/libusb0 without specifying
a source tree path, the default was <workspace>/sources/virtual/libusb0
which isn't correct - it should be using the mapped name i.e.
libusb-compat (in the default OE-Core configuration). Reorder some of
the code to ensure that the mapped name is used.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
As suggested by Khem Raj.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Create config fragment if the user makes modifications to kernel config.
User may change .config e.g. by directly editing it or by running the
'do_menuconfig' bitbake task. Devtool generates one monolithic fragment
by simply doing a diff between .config and .config.baseline files in the
source directory. If either of these files is missing, the config
fragment is not gerenrated or updated. The output is a file,
'devtool-fragment.cfg' that gets added to SRC_URI in the recipe (as well
as copied into the 'oe-local-files' directory if that is present in the
source tree).
${S}/.config will be a symlink to ${B}/.config. We need to do this as
devtool is not able to access ${B} because ${B} is set in a .bbappend in
the workspace layer which is not parsed by devtool itself.
[YOCTO #8999]
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Copy kernel config is copied to the source directory at a later phase in
_extract_source() so that it gets copied when devtool sync is done, too.
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
I should have adjusted this in OE-Core commit
80a44e52609a89d9ffe816181ae193af491c06ac where the behaviour changed.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If files would be overwritten by the deployment, preserve them in a
separate location on the target so that they can be restored if you
later run devtool undeploy-target.
At the same time, also check for sufficient space before starting the
operation so that we avoid potentially failing part way through.
Fixes [YOCTO #8978].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If you want to put the target device back to exactly how it was before
devtool deploy-target started poking things into it, then it would make
things easier if you didn't have to figure out which recipes were
deployed. Now that we have the list stored on the target we can
determine this reliably, so add a -a/--all option to undeploy-target to
undeploy everything that has been deployed.
One of the side-effects of this is that the dry-run functionality for
undeploy-target had to be reimplemented to actually run the script on
the target, since we have no way of knowing what's been deployed from
the host side. We don't need to do the same for deploy-target though
since we know exactly which files will be deployed without referring to
the target.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When running devtool deploy-target, we save a list of deployed files,
and this list is used by devtool undeploy-target (or the next time
deploy-target is run if the list is present, in case any files have been
renamed or deleted since the first time). We were writing this file to
the host, but it makes more sense to write the list to the target
instead, so that if we for example swap in a different board, or switch
hosts, things will work as expected.
In order to do this properly we have to construct a shell script and
ship it over to the target so we can run it. The manifest is written out
to a hidden directory in the root (/.devtool).
Fixes [YOCTO #7908].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Get the default value for updateserver from the configuration file and
show it in the help; also only make the parameter optional if it's
specified. This means we can also drop the check in the function as
argparse will then ensure it's specified if there's no config setting.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add a long description used when running --help on the specific command.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The listing of subcommands in the --help output for devtool was starting
to get difficult to follow, with commands appearing in no particular
order (due to some being in separate modules and the order of those
modules being parsed). Logically grouping the subcommands as well as
being able to exercise some control over the order of the subcommands
and groups would help, if we do so without losing the dynamic nature of
the list (i.e. that it comes from the plugins). Argparse provides no
built-in way to handle this and really, really makes it a pain to add,
but with some subclassing and hacking it's now possible, and can be
extended by any plugin as desired.
To put a subcommand into a group, all you need to do is specify a group=
parameter in the call to subparsers.add_parser(). you can also specify
an order= parameter to make the subcommand sort higher or lower in the
list (higher order numbers appear first, so use negative numbers to
force items to the end if that's what you want). To add a new group, use
subparsers.add_subparser_group(), supplying the name, description and
optionally an order number for the group itself (again, higher numbers
appear first).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If we didn't make any changes to the file then there's no point warning
the user that we have done.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If files had been created next to the recipe (for example devtool add,
edit the source and commit and then devtool update-recipe), running
devtool reset failed to preserve those files and gave an error due
to trying to rmdir the directory containing them which wasn't empty.
Fix the preservation of files in the "attic" directory properly so
we catch anything under the directory for the recipe, and replicate
the same structure in the attic directory rather than slightly
flattening it as we were before.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Looking at Chris Larson's code for starting the user's editor for
"recipetool newappend" it was slightly better than what I wrote for
"devtool edit-recipe" in that it checks VISUAL as well as EDITOR and
defaults to vi if neither are set, so break this out to its own function
and call it from both places. The broken out version passes shell=True
however in case it's a more complicated command rather than just a name
of an executable.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
There is no -N/--name option for devtool, that's a recipetool option -
with devtool you just specify the name as a positional argument.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Fix a regression introduced in in OE-Core revision
aedfc5a5db1c4b2b80a36147c9a13b31764d91dd where specifying a local source
tree without specifying a name resulted in a traceback.
Fixes [YOCTO #9086].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
It's going to be more common for users not to have the prepared source
tree for a recipe already, so the default behaviour ought to be to
extract it for them from the recipe. Change the default to extract
(effectively making the -x option a no-op) and add a --no-extract/-n
option to disable it. Later we can look at trying to be smart and
reusing an existing source tree instead of erroring out if it exists;
for now this is just the default reversal.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When extracting source for a recipe, if there are additional custom
tasks run that make changes to the source, create a commit in the
generated git branch so they are contained. This is particularly
useful for tasks that come before do_patch since otherwise the changes
might get incorporated in the first applied patch, but otherwise it
helps avoid the tree being dirty at any point.
Fixes [YOCTO #7626].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
When you need to set EXTRA_OECONF for a recipe, you need to know what
options the configure script actually supports; the configure script
however is only accessible from within a devshell and (at least in the
case of autotooled software fetched from an SCM repository) may not
actually exist until do_configure has run. Thus, provide a "devtool
configure-help" subcommand that runs the configure script for a recipe
with --help and shows you the output through a pager (e.g. less),
prefaced by a header describing the current options being specified.
There is basic support for autotools, cmake and bare configure scripts.
The cmake support is a little hacky since cmake doesn't really have a
concise help option that lists user-defined knobs (without actually
running through the configure process), however that being a design
feature of cmake there's not much I can think of to do about that at
the moment.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When we run the tasks required to extract the source for a recipe (e.g.
within "devtool modify" or "devtool extract") if one of those tasks
fails you get a bb.build.FuncFailed exception; handle this properly so
you don't see a traceback.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If a recipe generated by "devtool add" has been modified since then when
you run "devtool reset", it will be moved into the "attic" subdirectory
of the workspace in case those modifications need to be preserved. It
seems natural that if those modifications were worth preserving we
should warn the user if such a file exists when they run "devtool add"
to create the same recipe again, so they can pick up where they left off
if they want to.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Provide an option to devtool build-image to specify the list of packages
instead of taking the list of packages produced by recipes in the
workspace. Sometimes you don't want all of these packages; other times
you want to add more.
This is the most immediate fix for [YOCTO #8855], though it is a little
crude so I would like to provide better means of customising the image
contents later.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
standard.py is getting a bit large; move the "utility" commands to
another module.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
source
Sometimes you don't want to build an entire project, just a subdirectory
of it; add a --src-subdir option to make that easier. (We still look for
a single subdirectory in what gets unpacked, e.g. what you might find
within a tarball, so whatever you specify with this option is added onto
the end of that.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add the ability to install additional pre-built items (from shared
state) into the extensible SDK. This can already be done implicitly by
adding something to DEPENDS within a recipe you're working on and then
running "devtool build", but it's useful to be able to explicitly
install things particularly if you're using the extensible SDK as a
traditional toolchain.
Note that for this command to be useful you need to have SSTATE_MIRRORS
set in your SDK configuration, and that mirror needs to be populated
with sstate artifacts for recipes you wish to be able to install.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Make the following improvements to the SDK update process:
* Use a manifest file with sha256sums to track files other than sstate
and metadata that we need to update - e.g. conf files. This allows us
to handle where files such as auto.conf may or may not be present,
as well as the configuration changing without affecting task signatures
- we still want the config files copied in that case rather than it
saying nothing needs to be done.
* Write the SSTATE_MIRRORS_append to site.conf rather than local.conf
so that local.conf remains static (since we don't want to trigger an
update every time). Also, If there is an SSTATE_MIRRORS value already
set in the configuration we can skip this and assume it contains the
needed packages.
* Allow the update process to be run in any directory, don't assume
we're already at the base of the SDK
* Where practical, fetch remote files into a temporary location and
then move them to the desired location at the end, to avoid a
failed update leaving the SDK in a broken state.
* Update all installed do_populate_sysroot / do_packagedata tasks
instead of using the SDK targets. This ensures any item installed
through dependencies after installation (e.g. when running
"devtool build") won't go stale.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
* Use tempfile.mkdtemp() instead of hardcoding temp dir
* Set a variable early for the temp locked sigs file and use that
everywhere
* Delete the temp dir at the end
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When you run devtool build, you need to have the pkgdata written out at
the end, so that if what you're adding is a library and the next thing
you add is something that depends on that library, the necessary
information to map the dependency back to the recipe is present. In
practical terms all this means is we need do_packagedata to run in
addition to do_populate_sysroot.
This does mean that do_package needs to run which wasn't running before,
and that means that the few package QA tests that run within do_package
such as installed-vs-shipped will now be run. This may be a bit
bothersome, and prompted a fix for one of our oe-selftest tests as a
result, but I don't see an easy way around it. Ultimately if you care
about using the recipe in an image you'll need to fix any such errors
anyway.
Fixes [YOCTO #8887].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add a variable SDK_INCLUDE_PKGDATA which you can set to "1" to include
pkgdata for all recipes in the world target. There are a couple of uses
for this:
1) If you use "devtool add" to add a recipe that builds something which
depends on anything in world, the dependency can then be correctly
mapped to the recipe providing it and that recipe can be added to
DEPENDS, since we have the pkg-config and shared library dependency
data within pkgdata.
2) You'll be able to search for these recipes and any files they
package for the target with "devtool search" since that also uses
pkgdata
This of course assumes you've tailored world through EXCLUDE_FROM_WORLD
to only include recipes you'd want built in your distro, but I think
that's a reasonable assumption; failing that there is a
WORLD_PKGDATA_EXCLUDE variable that you can set to exclude any recipes
you don't want.
Note that this patch relies on functionality implemented in a recent
BitBake patch and will not work without it.
Implements [YOCTO #8600].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
workarounds
Rather than horrible workarounds, use the new --setscene-only option
of bitbake to pre-populate the SDK structures.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
It's logical that you would want to build BBCLASSEXTENDed items
separately through devtool build, so simply allow that - we're just
passing the name verbatim to bitbake, so all it means is adjusting the
validation.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the recipe file itself was created in the workspace, and it uses
BBCLASSEXTEND (e.g. through devtool add --also-native), then we need to
clean the other variants as well.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We're doing this in a couple of places, let's just find the recipe file
if it exists within the workspace (which it will if it's been added
through "devtool add") when we read in the workspace.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Sometimes you need to build a variant of a recipe for the build
host as well as for the target (i.e. BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"); add a
--also-native command line option to "recipetool create" that enables
this and plumb it through from an identical option for "devtool add".
(We could conceivably do the same for nativesdk, but I felt it might be
confusing within the context of the extensible SDK, where nativesdk
isn't really relevant to the user.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We need to run the clean for all recipes that are being reset before we
start deleting things from the workspace; if we don't, recipes providing
dependencies may be missing when we come to clean a recipe later (since
we don't and couldn't practically reset them in dependency order). This
also improves performance since we have the startup startup time for the
clean just once rather than for every recipe.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
For debugging purposes it's useful to be able to skip the preparation
step so you can inspect what the state of the build system is first.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Running "raise" with no arguments here is invalid, we're not in
exception handling context. Rather than also adding code to catch the
exception I just moved the check out to the parent function from which
we can just exit.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
* Clone the correct path - we need .git on the end
* Pull from the specified path instead of expecting a remote to be set
* up in the repo already (it isn't by default)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
Paul Eggleton
Markus Lehtonen
Richard Purdie