aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/scripts/lib/devtool/utilcmds.py
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* devtool: configure-help: fix error if do_configure not already runPaul Eggleton2016-03-231-1/+1
| | | | | | | | The code here for running do_configure if it hadn't already been run was using the wrong string substitution parameters; fix it and test it. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* devtool: categorise and order subcommands in help outputPaul Eggleton2016-02-211-2/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The listing of subcommands in the --help output for devtool was starting to get difficult to follow, with commands appearing in no particular order (due to some being in separate modules and the order of those modules being parsed). Logically grouping the subcommands as well as being able to exercise some control over the order of the subcommands and groups would help, if we do so without losing the dynamic nature of the list (i.e. that it comes from the plugins). Argparse provides no built-in way to handle this and really, really makes it a pain to add, but with some subclassing and hacking it's now possible, and can be extended by any plugin as desired. To put a subcommand into a group, all you need to do is specify a group= parameter in the call to subparsers.add_parser(). you can also specify an order= parameter to make the subcommand sort higher or lower in the list (higher order numbers appear first, so use negative numbers to force items to the end if that's what you want). To add a new group, use subparsers.add_subparser_group(), supplying the name, description and optionally an order number for the group itself (again, higher numbers appear first). Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* devtool / recipetool: use common code for launching editorPaul Eggleton2016-02-211-11/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Looking at Chris Larson's code for starting the user's editor for "recipetool newappend" it was slightly better than what I wrote for "devtool edit-recipe" in that it checks VISUAL as well as EDITOR and defaults to vi if neither are set, so break this out to its own function and call it from both places. The broken out version passes shell=True however in case it's a more complicated command rather than just a name of an executable. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* devtool: add configure-help subcommandPaul Eggleton2016-01-261-0/+170
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When you need to set EXTRA_OECONF for a recipe, you need to know what options the configure script actually supports; the configure script however is only accessible from within a devshell and (at least in the case of autotooled software fetched from an SCM repository) may not actually exist until do_configure has run. Thus, provide a "devtool configure-help" subcommand that runs the configure script for a recipe with --help and shows you the output through a pager (e.g. less), prefaced by a header describing the current options being specified. There is basic support for autotools, cmake and bare configure scripts. The cmake support is a little hacky since cmake doesn't really have a concise help option that lists user-defined knobs (without actually running through the configure process), however that being a design feature of cmake there's not much I can think of to do about that at the moment. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* devtool: move edit-recipe to a separate modulePaul Eggleton2016-01-261-0/+70
standard.py is getting a bit large; move the "utility" commands to another module. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>