| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Right now `devtool build` runs populate_sysroot and packagedata tasks.
Adding deploy to this list, if the recipe has the deploy task, so that
the newly built artifacts are available in the deploy directory.
Applicable only for packages with deploy task, such as kernel.
[YOCTO#13382]
Signed-off-by: Jaewon Lee <jaewon.lee@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Enedino Hernandez Samaniego <alejandr@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
This adds SPDX license headers in place of the wide assortment of things
currently in our script headers. We default to GPL-2.0-only except for the
oeqa code where it was clearly submitted and marked as MIT on the most part
or some scripts which had the "or later" GPL versioning.
The patch also drops other obsolete bits of file headers where they were
encoountered such as editor modelines, obsolete maintainer information or
the phrase "All rights reserved" which is now obsolete and not required in
copyright headers (in this case its actually confusing for licensing as all
rights were not reserved).
More work is needed for OE-Core but this takes care of the bulk of the scripts
and meta/lib directories.
The top level LICENSE files are tweaked to match the new structure and the
SPDX naming.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add -c (--clean) optiont to 'devtool build' command so that users
could easily clean things up when using devtool.
I encountered a problem about do_prepare_recipe_sysroot failure
when using `devtool build' command and I found myself in a situation
where I either have to use `bitbake' command to clean things up or
use `rm' to remove the directories under ${WORKDIR}.
So add a clean option as it would be helpful when users want to clean
things up to prepare an environment for a clean build.
Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When you run devtool add on a source tree we attempt to figure out the
correct name and version for the recipe. However, despite our best
efforts, sometimes the name and/or version we come up with isn't
correct, and the only way to remedy that up until now was to reset the
recipe, delete the source tree and start again, specifying the name this
time. To avoid this slightly painful procedure, add a "rename"
subcommand that lets you rename the recipe and/or change the version.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Converted return value of items() keys() and values() to
lists when dictionary is modified in the loop and when
the result is added to the list.
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The listing of subcommands in the --help output for devtool was starting
to get difficult to follow, with commands appearing in no particular
order (due to some being in separate modules and the order of those
modules being parsed). Logically grouping the subcommands as well as
being able to exercise some control over the order of the subcommands
and groups would help, if we do so without losing the dynamic nature of
the list (i.e. that it comes from the plugins). Argparse provides no
built-in way to handle this and really, really makes it a pain to add,
but with some subclassing and hacking it's now possible, and can be
extended by any plugin as desired.
To put a subcommand into a group, all you need to do is specify a group=
parameter in the call to subparsers.add_parser(). you can also specify
an order= parameter to make the subcommand sort higher or lower in the
list (higher order numbers appear first, so use negative numbers to
force items to the end if that's what you want). To add a new group, use
subparsers.add_subparser_group(), supplying the name, description and
optionally an order number for the group itself (again, higher numbers
appear first).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When you run devtool build, you need to have the pkgdata written out at
the end, so that if what you're adding is a library and the next thing
you add is something that depends on that library, the necessary
information to map the dependency back to the recipe is present. In
practical terms all this means is we need do_packagedata to run in
addition to do_populate_sysroot.
This does mean that do_package needs to run which wasn't running before,
and that means that the few package QA tests that run within do_package
such as installed-vs-shipped will now be run. This may be a bit
bothersome, and prompted a fix for one of our oe-selftest tests as a
result, but I don't see an easy way around it. Ultimately if you care
about using the recipe in an image you'll need to fix any such errors
anyway.
Fixes [YOCTO #8887].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
It's logical that you would want to build BBCLASSEXTENDed items
separately through devtool build, so simply allow that - we're just
passing the name verbatim to bitbake, so all it means is adjusting the
validation.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
* Make some minor clarifications to help text
* Drop ArgumentDefaultsHelpFormatter and just put the defaults in the
text itself where needed (because otherwise you get defaults shown for
store_true options which is somewhat confusing).
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Enable access to the configuration object in register_commands() so that
we can read configuration values there; this allows us to show the
task that will be run in the command line help for the build subcommand.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Use a bbappend file to set PARALLEL_MAKE instead of a postfile; this
is a bit neater and only affects the specified recipe.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
This function is no longer required to be defined for a plugin, so drop
it where it's a no-op.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Sometimes, particularly if you extracted the source to /tmp which is on
tmpfs, the external source tree that is being pointed to may no longer
exist when you come to run "devtool build" or "devtool update-recipe"
etc. Make all of the commands that need to check for a recipe being in
the workspace call a single function and have that function additionally
check the source tree still exists where appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Through -s/--disable-parallel-make, the user can turn off parallelism
on the make tool. This can be useful when debuging race condition issues.
In order to set PARALLEL_MAKE = "" a post-config file created and then
passed into the build.
[YOCTO #7589]
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The intention is to have a single file for each devtool feature
so devtool can grow in a modular way. In this direction, this patch creates
build.py, moving all related build features from standard.py to build.py.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
Jaewon Lee
Richard Purdie
Chen Qi
Paul Eggleton
Ed Bartosh
Leonardo Sandoval