Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This patch has been applied in several Linux distributions
Signed-off-by: Jate Sujjavanich <jatedev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Applies a patch from Debian to remove the build date from zip.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
... instead of a global exception list which was problematic.
[YOCTO #11896]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The infozip FTP server appears to have been taken down, so change the SRC_URI to
point at their SourceForge project.
Also as the SRC_URI can't be generated from the version and there is no other
user of the .inc, merge the .bb and .inc together.
[ YOCTO #9655 ]
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
recipes
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Makefile makes use of CFLAGS_NOOPT. If we set that
when calling make we can options like -g. The Makefile
will override any optimization to -O3.
Upstream-Status: Pending
Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <jslater@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses
found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas:
- LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked
- LICENSE field has a license with no version
- LICENSE field was actually incorrect
- LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist
This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior
commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional
SPDXLICENSEMAP entries.
HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front.
For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit
That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found
enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at
how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|