summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta/recipes-extended/less/less_444.bb
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2012-11-18less: Update to 451Saul Wold
LICENSE file was changed to match the BSD-2 Clause Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-08-15less: cleanup update-alternatives deprecated codeSaul Wold
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
2012-05-30less: use BPN for alternativesMark Hatle
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
2012-03-14PR bump for all recipes that DEPEND on ncursesScott Garman
The packaging changes to ncurses could break package feeds, so bump the PR on everythong that DEPENDS on ncurses. Signed-off-by: Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-02-24less_444.bb: Adding license email from authorElizabeth Flanagan
This slipped off my plate. Adding the email response from the author of less which allows us to use a generic BSD instead of the less license. Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2011-12-21less: Correcting generic licenseBeth Flanagan
I've asked and received permission from Mark Nudelman, the author of less, to utilize a generic BSD 2 clause license for less, instead of creating a common "less" license file. Signed-off-by: Beth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2011-12-08OECore license fixes: meta/*Elizabeth Flanagan
This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas: - LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked - LICENSE field has a license with no version - LICENSE field was actually incorrect - LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional SPDXLICENSEMAP entries. HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front. For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package. Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
2011-12-02less: Update to 444Saul Wold
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>