| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When rpmdeps files a perl script, it attempts to determine what it provides
and what it requires. Often the requires are incorrect, within the context
of Wind River Linux. This results in an error that DNF is unable to install
a package due to one or more unresolved dependencies.
In RPM5 we had disabled this behavior, the alternative is to require that all
perl scripts be 'complete', in that they only require things they absolutely
need and that OE provides. If we ever enforce that, this commit can be
reverted. Until they fall back to prior behavior (which also matches ipkg
and deb style packages.)
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
This greatly reduces build times when there is a large amount of small
rpm packages to produce. The patches are rather invasive,
and so will be submitted upstream.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This will send the output from rpmfcPrint() to stdout. This is an
alternative to using the --rpmfcdebug option, which will send the same
output to stderr. The two options have totally different use cases
though. While --alldeps is used when the output from rpmfcPrint() is
what is wanted, --rpmfcdebug can be used together with the other
output options, e.g., --requires, without affecting their output.
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This avoids the following warning:
warning: Ignoring invalid regex %{_docdir}
when runing `rpmdeps -R <file>`, since %{_docdir} is only defined when
parsing a spec file.
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
There is nothing that requires, e.g., a DSO to be executable, but it
is still an ELF binary and should be identified as such.
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[YOCTO #11180]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The dnf stack is written and tested against rpm 4.x. So if we want to use dnf for packaging,
we should also use rpm 4 - there's simply too much work involved in making rpm 5 work with it due
to significant API differences, and supporting that going forward.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
|
Mark Hatle
Alexander Kanavin
Peter Kjellerstedt