Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The base_contains is kept as a compatibility method and we ought to
not use it in OE-Core so we can remove it from base metadata in
future.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
lttng-modules and gcc-4.8 don't mix, according to the lttng ML
'current_thread_info() not respecting program order with gcc 4.8.x',
so remove it from arm builds.
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the systemd DISTRO_FEATURE is enabled, then recommend systemd-analyze for
profiling boot performance.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
systemap and valgrind are not buildable for mips64, so exclude them for
mips64 from packagegroup-core-tools-profile.
Signed-off-by: Kai Kang <kai.kang@windriver.com>
|
|
Now that liburcu supports mips, this packagegroup can pull in lttng recipes
(lttng-ust, lttng-tools, lttng-modules, babeltrace) on that architecture as it
does for the others.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-ust was removed by a previous patch, which
also removed the naming conflict that caused the lttng-2.0 version of
lttng-ust to be named lttng2-ust. lttng2-ust was the only lttng-2.0
recipe to be named in this way and since that was entirely due to the
conflict, we can go back to the consistent naming for it.
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jack Mitchell <jack.mitchell@dbbroadcast.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
packagegroup-core-tools-profile currently pulls in the 'legacy' lttng
packages, which are useless without legacy lttng support in the kernel.
This makes packagegroup-core-tools-profile pull in the lttng 2.0
packages instead, which don't need any kernel modifications to work.
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
These are needed to support upgrading from task-* to packagegroup-*
within existing target images at runtime.
Note: these settings will very likely be moved out to a separate inc
file at some point in the future.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Allow references to the old task packages to continue to work. This does
not add RPROVIDES for everything, just those packages that are likely to
have been referred to.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Since package groups don't actually fetch or distribute anything and we
no longer run do_configure we don't need to set this variable anymore.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Also clean out items already handled by that class (dev/dbg packages,
ALLOW_EMPTY, etc.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
"Package group" is a much more appropriate name for these than task,
since we use the word task to describe units of work executed by
BitBake.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|