diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/recipes-support/libsoup/files/fix-compiling-failed-while-mips-gcc-optimization-enabled.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-support/libsoup/files/fix-compiling-failed-while-mips-gcc-optimization-enabled.patch | 95 |
1 files changed, 95 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libsoup/files/fix-compiling-failed-while-mips-gcc-optimization-enabled.patch b/meta/recipes-support/libsoup/files/fix-compiling-failed-while-mips-gcc-optimization-enabled.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..346964261d --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libsoup/files/fix-compiling-failed-while-mips-gcc-optimization-enabled.patch @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +test/header-parsing.c: fix compiling failed while mips-gcc optimization enabled + +There was an error about mips-gcc optimization while compiling +libsoup-2.4 2.45.3 with DEBUG_OPTIMIZATION enabled. + +The test code of libsoup-2.4 2.45.3 triggered gcc assert which located +in gcc/dwarf2out.c:20810: +... +20806 gcc_assert (prev +20807 && (CALL_P (prev) +20808 || (NONJUMP_INSN_P (prev) +20809 && GET_CODE (PATTERN (prev)) == SEQUENCE +20810 && CALL_P (XVECEXP (PATTERN (prev), 0, 0))))); +... + +The issue test code is the C function 'do_qvalue_tests' located in +tests/header-parsing.c. + +The 2.45.92 have refactored the test code and this issue has been fixed. +So backport the fix to 2.45.3. + +Upstream-Status: backport +Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com> +--- + tests/header-parsing.c | 28 ++-------------------------- + 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/tests/header-parsing.c b/tests/header-parsing.c +index 5b2950f..00f5a4e 100644 +--- a/tests/header-parsing.c ++++ b/tests/header-parsing.c +@@ -896,9 +896,7 @@ do_qvalue_tests (void) + { + int i, j; + GSList *acceptable, *unacceptable, *iter; +- gboolean wrong; + +- debug_printf (1, "qvalue tests\n"); + for (i = 0; i < num_qvaluetests; i++) { + debug_printf (1, "%2d. %s:\n", i + 1, qvaluetests[i].header_value); + +@@ -907,48 +905,26 @@ do_qvalue_tests (void) + &unacceptable); + + debug_printf (1, " acceptable: "); +- wrong = FALSE; + if (acceptable) { + for (iter = acceptable, j = 0; iter; iter = iter->next, j++) { + debug_printf (1, "%s ", (char *)iter->data); +- if (!qvaluetests[i].acceptable[j] || +- strcmp (iter->data, qvaluetests[i].acceptable[j]) != 0) +- wrong = TRUE; ++ g_assert_cmpstr (iter->data, ==, qvaluetests[i].acceptable[j]); + } + debug_printf (1, "\n"); + soup_header_free_list (acceptable); + } else + debug_printf (1, "(none)\n"); +- if (wrong) { +- debug_printf (1, " WRONG! expected: "); +- for (j = 0; qvaluetests[i].acceptable[j]; j++) +- debug_printf (1, "%s ", qvaluetests[i].acceptable[j]); +- debug_printf (1, "\n"); +- errors++; +- } + + debug_printf (1, " unacceptable: "); +- wrong = FALSE; + if (unacceptable) { + for (iter = unacceptable, j = 0; iter; iter = iter->next, j++) { + debug_printf (1, "%s ", (char *)iter->data); +- if (!qvaluetests[i].unacceptable[j] || +- strcmp (iter->data, qvaluetests[i].unacceptable[j]) != 0) +- wrong = TRUE; ++ g_assert_cmpstr (iter->data, ==, qvaluetests[i].unacceptable[j]); + } + debug_printf (1, "\n"); + soup_header_free_list (unacceptable); + } else + debug_printf (1, "(none)\n"); +- if (wrong) { +- debug_printf (1, " WRONG! expected: "); +- for (j = 0; qvaluetests[i].unacceptable[j]; j++) +- debug_printf (1, "%s ", qvaluetests[i].unacceptable[j]); +- debug_printf (1, "\n"); +- errors++; +- } +- +- debug_printf (1, "\n"); + } + } + +-- +1.7.9.5 + |