aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch')
-rw-r--r--meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch52
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 52 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 1a48db63c6..0000000000
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
-From 67ec7531e6297200eaa97ef917d49b0a75876cb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
-Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 00:56:07 -0800
-Subject: [PATCH] lib/transaction.c: fix file conflicts for MIPS64 N32
-
-The following error can occur:
- smart install libc6-2.22-r0.1@lib32_mips32r2octeon3 libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1@lib32_mips32r2octeon3
-error: file /sbin/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of libc6-2.22-r0.1.lib32_mips32r2octeon3 and libc6-2.22-r0.1.octeon3_n32
-error: file /sbin/.debug/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1.lib32_mips32r2octeon3 and libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1.octeon3_n32
-
-This was because:
-transactions_color = 001 (ELF32) & 010 (ELF64) & 100 (ELF32 N32 MIPS64)
-FColor = Current file color (001) & transaction_color (111)
-oFcolor = Previous file color (100) & transaction_color (111)
-
-There are two places where the conflict comparisons occur. In both places
-the 'else' clause was too restrictive (opposite of the 'positive' clause).
-This caused the system to only permit a binary comparison - "new preferred" or
-"old preferred". It did not permissing "neither preferred". By removing the
-else comparison the system will now perform a 'last-in-wins' resolution when
-"neither is preferred".
-
-Upstream-Status: Submitted [RPM5 maintainer]
-
-Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
-Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
----
- lib/transaction.c | 3 ++-
- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-Index: rpm-5.4.14/lib/transaction.c
-===================================================================
---- rpm-5.4.14.orig/lib/transaction.c
-+++ rpm-5.4.14/lib/transaction.c
-@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static int handleInstInstalledFile(const
- fi->actions[fx] = FA_SKIPCOLOR;
- #endif
- rConflicts = 0;
-- } else if (FColor & prefcolor) {
-+ } else {
- #ifdef REFERENCE
- rpmfsSetAction(fs, fx, FA_CREATE);
- #else
-@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ assert(otherFi != NULL);
- fi->actions[i] = FA_SKIPCOLOR;
- rConflicts = 0;
- } else
-- if (FColor == 0 && oFColor == 0) {
-+ {
- /* ... otherwise, do both, last in wins. */
- otherFi->actions[otherFileNum] = FA_CREATE;
- fi->actions[i] = FA_CREATE;