diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/recipes-connectivity/wpa-supplicant/wpa-supplicant/0001-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-reassembly-buffer-handling.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-connectivity/wpa-supplicant/wpa-supplicant/0001-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-reassembly-buffer-handling.patch | 48 |
1 files changed, 48 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/wpa-supplicant/wpa-supplicant/0001-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-reassembly-buffer-handling.patch b/meta/recipes-connectivity/wpa-supplicant/wpa-supplicant/0001-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-reassembly-buffer-handling.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..45e6e87dfe --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/wpa-supplicant/wpa-supplicant/0001-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-reassembly-buffer-handling.patch @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +From fe76f487e28bdc61940f304f153a954cf36935ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org> +Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 01:55:32 +0300 +Subject: [PATCH 1/3] EAP-pwd server: Fix reassembly buffer handling + +data->inbuf allocation might fail and if that were to happen, the next +fragment in the exchange could have resulted in NULL pointer +dereference. Unexpected fragment with more bit might also be able to +trigger this. Fix that by explicitly checking for data->inbuf to be +available before using it. + +Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org> +Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> +Upstream-Status: Backport +CVE: CVE-2019-11555 +--- + src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c | 8 +++++++- + 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) + +diff --git a/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c b/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c +index 11bef55..38e2af8 100644 +--- a/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c ++++ b/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c +@@ -912,6 +912,12 @@ static void eap_pwd_process(struct eap_sm *sm, void *priv, + * the first and all intermediate fragments have the M bit set + */ + if (EAP_PWD_GET_MORE_BIT(lm_exch) || data->in_frag_pos) { ++ if (!data->inbuf) { ++ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, ++ "EAP-pwd: No buffer for reassembly"); ++ eap_pwd_state(data, FAILURE); ++ return; ++ } + if ((data->in_frag_pos + len) > wpabuf_size(data->inbuf)) { + wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAP-pwd: Buffer overflow " + "attack detected! (%d+%d > %d)", +@@ -932,7 +938,7 @@ static void eap_pwd_process(struct eap_sm *sm, void *priv, + * last fragment won't have the M bit set (but we're obviously + * buffering fragments so that's how we know it's the last) + */ +- if (data->in_frag_pos) { ++ if (data->in_frag_pos && data->inbuf) { + pos = wpabuf_head_u8(data->inbuf); + len = data->in_frag_pos; + wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAP-pwd: Last fragment, %d bytes", +-- +2.7.4 + |