diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch | 56 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 56 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 57fd494464..0000000000 --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,56 +0,0 @@ -From 1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> -Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000 -Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf - certs - -Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we -later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf -cert was bad. - -Fixes: CVE-2023-0465 - -Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20587) - -Upstream-Status: Backport from [https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb] -CVE: CVE-2023-0465 -Signed-off-by: Siddharth Doshi <sdoshi@mvista.com> ---- - crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 12 ++++++++++-- - 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c -index 9384f1d..a0282c3 100644 ---- a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c -+++ b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c -@@ -1654,15 +1654,23 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx) - goto memerr; - /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */ - if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) { -- int i; -+ int i, cbcalled = 0; - - /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */ -- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { -+ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { - X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i); - -+ if ((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0) -+ cbcalled = 1; - CB_FAIL_IF((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0, - ctx, x, i, X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION); - } -+ if (!cbcalled) { -+ /* Should not be able to get here */ -+ ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR); -+ return 0; -+ } -+ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */ - return 1; - } - if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) { --- -2.35.7 - |