diff options
author | Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> | 2023-02-15 16:59:58 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> | 2024-11-07 23:51:25 +0100 |
commit | b155801225ee04e9d7aa35e2c0b6615b49a8d221 (patch) | |
tree | 63ab6a3764096b9b10a16bb72538d31892bbd5e6 /meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-hypothesis/test_binary_search.py | |
parent | 848f2155389c3e6a9df379b1026457504992657e (diff) | |
download | openembedded-core-contrib-jansa/master.tar.gz |
patchreview: use check_upstream_status() from oe.qajansa/master
* the idea was to reuse the same function as I've noticed that the
QA check which was added to insane.bbclass in:
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=76a685bfcf927593eac67157762a53259089ea8a
is in some cases more strcit than scripts/contrib/patchreview.py
To be honest I wasn't aware of scripts/contrib/patchreview.py
existence when I've asked about moving check_upstream_status()
to oe.qa in order to write standalone script just like
patchreview.py
* I've sent this long time ago:
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/177207
but didn't like the sys.path.append to find oe.qa much or the
duplicated path to .patch file in the output, then I've forgot about
it until today in https://github.com/OE4T/meta-tegra/pull/1749
where checklayer found one more issue, which I haven't noticed
with patchreview.py before (because I've accidentally used a version
without this change). It's not perfect, but at least it will be
consistent with checklayer and patch-status QA check.
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-hypothesis/test_binary_search.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions