diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/libhugetlbfs/files/add-PROT-NONE-to-the-mprotest-test.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/libhugetlbfs/files/add-PROT-NONE-to-the-mprotest-test.patch | 38 |
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/libhugetlbfs/files/add-PROT-NONE-to-the-mprotest-test.patch b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/libhugetlbfs/files/add-PROT-NONE-to-the-mprotest-test.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..673f2046dd --- /dev/null +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/libhugetlbfs/files/add-PROT-NONE-to-the-mprotest-test.patch @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +Upstream-Status: Pending + +From c7fcb7270bb510d7271a1c0cea095a4dbea49420 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org> +Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:00:45 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH] Add PROT_NONE to the mprotect test. + +The mprotect unit test checks PROT_READ and PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE +protections. We recently found that PROT_NONE wasn't properly +supported in our huge page kernel code. + +This patch adds PROT_NONE tests to mprotect. The expected behaviour +is that neither reads nor writes should succeed. + +Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org> +--- + tests/mprotect.c | 6 ++++++ + 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) + +diff --git a/tests/mprotect.c b/tests/mprotect.c +index aa4673e..db6a662 100644 +--- a/tests/mprotect.c ++++ b/tests/mprotect.c +@@ -213,5 +213,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) + test_mprotect(fd, "RW->R 1/2", 2*hpage_size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, + hpage_size, PROT_READ); + ++ /* PROT_NONE tests */ ++ test_mprotect(fd, "NONE->R", hpage_size, PROT_NONE, ++ hpage_size, PROT_READ); ++ test_mprotect(fd, "NONE->RW", hpage_size, PROT_NONE, ++ hpage_size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE); ++ + PASS(); + } +-- +1.7.9.5 + |