aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf/0001-Lower-init-prio-for-extension-attributes.patch
blob: 9f4fd7179672e5b8422730a60c11100e9e97b6b2 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
From 00362d12edf1b7fde723b041a4569dc659e65ad1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jani Nurminen <jani.nurminen@windriver.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 09:56:11 +0200
Subject: Lower init prio for extension attributes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Added PROTOBUF_EXTENSION_ATTRIBUTE_INIT_PRIORITY in
code generation for extension attributes.
It has lower prio than PROTOBUF_ATTRIBUTE_INIT_PRIORITY to
ensure that extension attributes are initialized after
other attribute.
This is needed in some applications to avoid segmentation fault.

Reported by Karl-Herman Näslund.

Signed-off-by: Jani Nurminen <jani.nurminen@windriver.com>

Upstream-Status: Pending

Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
---
 src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_extension.cc | 2 +-
 src/google/protobuf/port_def.inc                  | 7 +++++++
 src/google/protobuf/port_undef.inc                | 1 +
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_extension.cc b/src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_extension.cc
index 3792db81a..cbec19d30 100644
--- a/src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_extension.cc
+++ b/src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_extension.cc
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ void ExtensionGenerator::GenerateDefinition(io::Printer* printer) {
   }
 
   format(
-      "PROTOBUF_ATTRIBUTE_INIT_PRIORITY "
+      "PROTOBUF_EXTENSION_ATTRIBUTE_INIT_PRIORITY "
       "::$proto_ns$::internal::ExtensionIdentifier< $extendee$,\n"
       "    ::$proto_ns$::internal::$type_traits$, $field_type$, $packed$ >\n"
       "  $scoped_name$($constant_name$, $1$);\n",
diff --git a/src/google/protobuf/port_def.inc b/src/google/protobuf/port_def.inc
index ae9fef425..f1d203707 100644
--- a/src/google/protobuf/port_def.inc
+++ b/src/google/protobuf/port_def.inc
@@ -154,6 +154,9 @@
 #ifdef PROTOBUF_ATTRIBUTE_INIT_PRIORITY
 #error PROTOBUF_ATTRIBUTE_INIT_PRIORITY was previously defined
 #endif
+#ifdef PROTOBUF_EXTENSION_ATTRIBUTE_INIT_PRIORITY
+#error PROTOBUF_EXTENSION_ATTRIBUTE_INIT_PRIORITY was previously defined
+#endif
 #ifdef PROTOBUF_PRAGMA_INIT_SEG
 #error PROTOBUF_PRAGMA_INIT_SEG was previously defined
 #endif
@@ -596,6 +599,10 @@
 // Highest priority is 101. We use 102 to allow code that really wants to
 // higher priority to still beat us.
 #define PROTOBUF_ATTRIBUTE_INIT_PRIORITY __attribute__((init_priority((102))))
+// Some embedded systems get a segmentation fault if extension attributes are
+// initialized with higher or equal priority as other attributes. This gives
+// extension attributes high priority, but lower than other attributes.
+#define PROTOBUF_EXTENSION_ATTRIBUTE_INIT_PRIORITY __attribute__((init_priority((103))))
 #else
 #define PROTOBUF_ATTRIBUTE_INIT_PRIORITY
 #endif
diff --git a/src/google/protobuf/port_undef.inc b/src/google/protobuf/port_undef.inc
index daef09bc4..d0c613b55 100644
--- a/src/google/protobuf/port_undef.inc
+++ b/src/google/protobuf/port_undef.inc
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@
 #undef PROTOBUF_ATTRIBUTE_WEAK
 #undef PROTOBUF_ATTRIBUTE_NO_DESTROY
 #undef PROTOBUF_ATTRIBUTE_INIT_PRIORITY
+#undef PROTOBUF_EXTENSION_ATTRIBUTE_INIT_PRIORITY
 #undef PROTOBUF_PRAGMA_INIT_SEG
 
 // Restore macro that may have been #undef'd in port_def.inc.
-- 
2.17.1