| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
|
|
Not only was uuid removed as a build dependency of Rygel in 0.27.1, but
oe-core's ossp-uuid has always renamed the library to libossp-uuid so it was
never used (as util-linux provides libuuid.so).
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
|
|
Fix the warning below and set proper license according to the
content of file COPYING in Rygel:
WARNING: rygel-0.34.0-r0 do_populate_lic: rygel: \
No generic license file exists for: LGPL1.1 in any provider
According to a git commit in Rygel made two years ago by Jens
Georg: "all: Update license text to LGPLv2.1 proper We always
claimed being LGPLv2.1 but the license text said differently."
In the same time the tag for Rygel 0.34 has been created on
20 March 2017, aka after this git commit. For more details:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/rygel/commit/cdcb6bd55efd0c3b7a2fd4ae5c3d8556f69f8402
Furthermore, the changelog of Rygel 0.34.0 also indicates
that the license is LGPLv2.1+ (after a fix in release 0.29.1):
https://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/changelog/rygel/0.34.0/log.html
Signed-off-by: Leon Anavi <leon.anavi@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Changhyeok Bae <changhyeok.bae@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
|
|
Fix build without X
Licence is more consistent now see
https://github.com/GNOME/rygel/commit/cdcb6bd55efd0c3b7a2fd4ae5c3d8556f69f8402
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
|
Khem Raj
Ross Burton
Leon Anavi
Changhyeok Bae