From 3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Elizabeth Flanagan Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 15:48:29 -0800 Subject: OECore license fixes: meta/* This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas: - LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked - LICENSE field has a license with no version - LICENSE field was actually incorrect - LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional SPDXLICENSEMAP entries. HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front. For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package. Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan --- meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.14.bb | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'meta/recipes-extended/xinetd') diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.14.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.14.bb index 159cb2cf26..26ba78f36c 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.14.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.14.bb @@ -2,11 +2,12 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Highly configurable, modular and secure inetd" HOMEPAGE = "http://www.xinetd.org" # xinetd is a BSD-like license -LICENSE = "xinetd" +# Apple and Gentoo say BSD here. +LICENSE = "BSD" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYRIGHT;md5=8ad8615198542444f84d28a6cf226dd8" DEPENDS = "" -PR ="r0" +PR ="r1" SRC_URI = "http://www.xinetd.org/xinetd-${PV}.tar.gz \ file://xinetd.init \ -- cgit 1.2.3-korg