1 files changed, 0 insertions, 79 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/0003-Introduce-condition-in-TPM-backend-for-notification.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/0003-Introduce-condition-in-TPM-backend-for-notification.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index e58f019062..0000000000
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/0003-Introduce-condition-in-TPM-backend-for-notification.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,79 +0,0 @@
-From 732a8e046948fd62b32cd1dd76a6798eb1caf4d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 11:23:32 -0500
-Subject: [PATCH 3/4] Introduce condition in TPM backend for notification
-
-TPM backends will suspend independently of the frontends. Also
-here we need to be able to wait for the TPM command to have been
-completely processed.
-
-Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
-Upstream-Status: Pending [https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-06/msg00252.html]
-Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
----
- hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
-
-diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c
-index 050f2ba850..44739ebad2 100644
---- a/hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c
-+++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c
-@@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ struct TPMPassthruState {
-     TPMVersion tpm_version;
-     ptm_cap cuse_cap; /* capabilities of the CUSE TPM */
-     uint8_t cur_locty_number; /* last set locality */
-+
-+    QemuMutex state_lock;
-+    QemuCond cmd_complete;  /* singnaled once tpm_busy is false */
-+    bool tpm_busy;
- };
- 
- typedef struct TPMPassthruState TPMPassthruState;
-@@ -274,6 +278,11 @@ static void tpm_passthrough_worker_thread(gpointer data,
-         thr_parms->recv_data_callback(thr_parms->tpm_state,
-                                       thr_parms->tpm_state->locty_number,
-                                       selftest_done);
-+        /* result delivered */
-+        qemu_mutex_lock(&tpm_pt->state_lock);
-+        tpm_pt->tpm_busy = false;
-+        qemu_cond_signal(&tpm_pt->cmd_complete);
-+        qemu_mutex_unlock(&tpm_pt->state_lock);
-         break;
-     case TPM_BACKEND_CMD_INIT:
-     case TPM_BACKEND_CMD_END:
-@@ -401,6 +410,7 @@ static void tpm_passthrough_reset(TPMBackend *tb)
-     tpm_backend_thread_end(&tpm_pt->tbt);
- 
-     tpm_pt->had_startup_error = false;
-+    tpm_pt->tpm_busy = false;
- }
- 
- static int tpm_passthrough_init(TPMBackend *tb, TPMState *s,
-@@ -478,6 +488,11 @@ static void tpm_passthrough_deliver_request(TPMBackend *tb)
- {
-     TPMPassthruState *tpm_pt = TPM_PASSTHROUGH(tb);
- 
-+    /* TPM considered busy once TPM Request scheduled for processing */
-+    qemu_mutex_lock(&tpm_pt->state_lock);
-+    tpm_pt->tpm_busy = true;
-+    qemu_mutex_unlock(&tpm_pt->state_lock);
-+
-     tpm_backend_thread_deliver_request(&tpm_pt->tbt);
- }
- 
-@@ -746,6 +761,11 @@ static const TPMDriverOps tpm_passthrough_driver = {
- 
- static void tpm_passthrough_inst_init(Object *obj)
- {
-+    TPMBackend *tb = TPM_BACKEND(obj);
-+    TPMPassthruState *tpm_pt = TPM_PASSTHROUGH(tb);
-+
-+    qemu_mutex_init(&tpm_pt->state_lock);
-+    qemu_cond_init(&tpm_pt->cmd_complete);
- }
- 
- static void tpm_passthrough_inst_finalize(Object *obj)
--- 
-2.11.0
-