base.bbclass: Report only the licenses that are incompatible for a package

Instead of reporting ${LICENSE} when a package is identified as using
an incompatible license, report the license(s) that are actually
incompatible.

Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
index a3170d219c..145daea3ec 100644
--- a/meta/classes/base.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
@@ -542,24 +542,30 @@ python () {
                 bb.note("Including %s as buildable despite it having an incompatible license because it has been whitelisted" % pn)
             else:
                 pkgs = d.getVar('PACKAGES').split()
-                skipped_pkgs = []
+                skipped_pkgs = {}
                 unskipped_pkgs = []
                 for pkg in pkgs:
-                    if incompatible_license(d, bad_licenses, pkg):
-                        skipped_pkgs.append(pkg)
+                    incompatible_lic = incompatible_license(d, bad_licenses, pkg)
+                    if incompatible_lic:
+                        skipped_pkgs[pkg] = incompatible_lic
                     else:
                         unskipped_pkgs.append(pkg)
-                all_skipped = skipped_pkgs and not unskipped_pkgs
                 if unskipped_pkgs:
                     for pkg in skipped_pkgs:
-                        bb.debug(1, "SKIPPING the package " + pkg + " at do_rootfs because it's " + license)
+                        bb.debug(1, "Skipping the package %s at do_rootfs because of incompatible license(s): %s" % (pkg, ' '.join(skipped_pkgs[pkg])))
                         mlprefix = d.getVar('MLPREFIX')
-                        d.setVar('LICENSE_EXCLUSION-' + mlprefix + pkg, 1)
+                        d.setVar('LICENSE_EXCLUSION-' + mlprefix + pkg, ' '.join(skipped_pkgs[pkg]))
                     for pkg in unskipped_pkgs:
-                        bb.debug(1, "INCLUDING the package " + pkg)
-                elif all_skipped or incompatible_license(d, bad_licenses):
-                    bb.debug(1, "SKIPPING recipe %s because it's %s" % (pn, license))
-                    raise bb.parse.SkipRecipe("it has an incompatible license: %s" % license)
+                        bb.debug(1, "Including the package %s" % pkg)
+                else:
+                    incompatible_lic = incompatible_license(d, bad_licenses)
+                    for pkg in skipped_pkgs:
+                        incompatible_lic += skipped_pkgs[pkg]
+                    incompatible_lic = sorted(list(set(incompatible_lic)))
+
+                    if incompatible_lic:
+                        bb.debug(1, "Skipping recipe %s because of incompatible license(s): %s" % (pn, ' '.join(incompatible_lic)))
+                        raise bb.parse.SkipRecipe("it has incompatible license(s): %s" % ' '.join(incompatible_lic))
 
         # Try to verify per-package (LICENSE_<pkg>) values. LICENSE should be a
         # superset of all per-package licenses. We do not do advanced (pattern)