aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>2015-07-31 16:40:07 +0100
committerRichard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>2015-09-19 11:51:06 +0100
commitc468724d2932708dffc766e182a69665de6226f6 (patch)
tree4eabbdd14b96749a904c11b376bf63d20d3e5fe6
parent3390dde6addaafad84c635eb37d2eae1ac22fcb7 (diff)
downloadopenembedded-core-c468724d2932708dffc766e182a69665de6226f6.zip
openembedded-core-c468724d2932708dffc766e182a69665de6226f6.tar.gz
openembedded-core-c468724d2932708dffc766e182a69665de6226f6.tar.bz2
base.bbclass: Note when including pn with INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSES
We need to be able to tell people if we WHITELIST a recipe that contains an incompatible licese. Example: If we set WHITELIST_GPL-3.0 ?= "foo", foo will end up on an image even if GPL-3.0 is incompatible. This is the correct behaviour but there is nothing telling people that it is even happening. (From OE-Core rev: c9da529943b2f563b7b0aeb43576c13dd3b6f932) Signed-off-by: Beth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@mvista.com>
-rw-r--r--meta/classes/base.bbclass29
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
index ff8c633..714a895 100644
--- a/meta/classes/base.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
@@ -434,12 +434,30 @@ python () {
bad_licenses = map(lambda l: canonical_license(d, l), bad_licenses)
whitelist = []
+ incompatwl = []
+ htincompatwl = []
for lic in bad_licenses:
+ spdx_license = return_spdx(d, lic)
for w in ["HOSTTOOLS_WHITELIST_", "LGPLv2_WHITELIST_", "WHITELIST_"]:
whitelist.extend((d.getVar(w + lic, True) or "").split())
- spdx_license = return_spdx(d, lic)
- if spdx_license:
- whitelist.extend((d.getVar('HOSTTOOLS_WHITELIST_%s' % spdx_license, True) or "").split())
+ if spdx_license:
+ whitelist.extend((d.getVar(w + spdx_license, True) or "").split())
+ '''
+ We need to track what we are whitelisting and why. If pn is
+ incompatible and is not HOSTTOOLS_WHITELIST_ we need to be
+ able to note that the image that is created may infact
+ contain incompatible licenses despite INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE
+ being set.
+ '''
+ if "HOSTTOOLS" in w:
+ htincompatwl.extend((d.getVar(w + lic, True) or "").split())
+ if spdx_license:
+ htincompatwl.extend((d.getVar(w + spdx_license, True) or "").split())
+ else:
+ incompatwl.extend((d.getVar(w + lic, True) or "").split())
+ if spdx_license:
+ incompatwl.extend((d.getVar(w + spdx_license, True) or "").split())
+
if not pn in whitelist:
recipe_license = d.getVar('LICENSE', True)
pkgs = d.getVar('PACKAGES', True).split()
@@ -460,6 +478,11 @@ python () {
elif all_skipped or incompatible_license(d, bad_licenses):
bb.debug(1, "SKIPPING recipe %s because it's %s" % (pn, recipe_license))
raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("incompatible with license %s" % recipe_license)
+ elif pn in whitelist:
+ if pn in incompatwl:
+ bb.note("INCLUDING " + pn + " as buildable despite INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE because it has been whitelisted")
+ elif pn in htincompatwl:
+ bb.note("INCLUDING " + pn + " as buildable despite INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE because it has been whitelisted for HOSTTOOLS")
srcuri = d.getVar('SRC_URI', True)
# Svn packages should DEPEND on subversion-native