1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
|
From f7d6a635fa3b7797f9d072e280f065bf3cfcd24d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:05:25 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] pci: assert configuration access is within bounds
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
While accessing PCI configuration bytes, assert that
'address + len' is within PCI configuration space.
Generally it is within bounds. This is more of a defensive
assert, in case a buggy device was to send 'address' which
may go out of bounds.
Suggested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <pjp@fedoraproject.org>
Message-Id: <20200604113525.58898-1-ppandit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Upstream-Status: Backport [f7d6a635fa3b7797f9d072e280f065bf3cfcd24d]
CVE: CVE-2020-13791
Signed-off-by: Sakib Sajal <sakib.sajal@windriver.com>
---
hw/pci/pci.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
index 70c66965f5..7bf2ae6d92 100644
--- a/hw/pci/pci.c
+++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
@@ -1381,6 +1381,8 @@ uint32_t pci_default_read_config(PCIDevice *d,
{
uint32_t val = 0;
+ assert(address + len <= pci_config_size(d));
+
if (pci_is_express_downstream_port(d) &&
ranges_overlap(address, len, d->exp.exp_cap + PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, 2)) {
pcie_sync_bridge_lnk(d);
@@ -1394,6 +1396,8 @@ void pci_default_write_config(PCIDevice *d, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val_in, int
int i, was_irq_disabled = pci_irq_disabled(d);
uint32_t val = val_in;
+ assert(addr + l <= pci_config_size(d));
+
for (i = 0; i < l; val >>= 8, ++i) {
uint8_t wmask = d->wmask[addr + i];
uint8_t w1cmask = d->w1cmask[addr + i];
--
2.20.1
|
