When cross compiling a target gcc, target flags may be used on the host Configure identifies a number of warning flags (WARN_CFLAGS and WARN_CXXFLAGS) from the $CC value. The cross compiler may be different from the host compiler and may not support the same set of flags. This leads to problems such as: cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-narrowing" cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-overlength-strings" Work around this problem by removing the warning flags from the BUILD_CXXFLAGS value, in a way similar to the BUILD_CFLAGS. Upstream-Status: Pending Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle Index: gcc-4.8.4/gcc/configure =================================================================== --- gcc-4.8.4.orig/gcc/configure +++ gcc-4.8.4/gcc/configure @@ -17864,7 +17864,7 @@ else lt_dlunknown=0; lt_dlno_uscore=1; lt_dlneed_uscore=2 lt_status=$lt_dlunknown cat > conftest.$ac_ext <<_LT_EOF -#line 17853 "configure" +#line 17867 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #if HAVE_DLFCN_H @@ -17970,7 +17970,7 @@ else lt_dlunknown=0; lt_dlno_uscore=1; lt_dlneed_uscore=2 lt_status=$lt_dlunknown cat > conftest.$ac_ext <<_LT_EOF -#line 17959 "configure" +#line 17973 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #if HAVE_DLFCN_H @@ -26918,18 +26918,15 @@ $as_echo "#define TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_S fi # Test for on the target. - -{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking sys/sdt.h in the target C library" >&5 -$as_echo_n "checking sys/sdt.h in the target C library... " >&6; } -have_sys_sdt_h=no +#GCC_TARGET_TEMPLATE([HAVE_SYS_SDT_H]) +#AC_MSG_CHECKING(sys/sdt.h in the target C library) +#have_sys_sdt_h=no #if test -f $target_header_dir/sys/sdt.h; then # have_sys_sdt_h=yes -# -#$as_echo "#define HAVE_SYS_SDT_H 1" >>confdefs.h -# +# AC_DEFINE(HAVE_SYS_SDT_H, 1, +# [Define if your target C library provides sys/sdt.h]) #fi -{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $have_sys_sdt_h" >&5 -$as_echo "$have_sys_sdt_h" >&6; } +#AC_MSG_RESULT($have_sys_sdt_h) # Check if TFmode long double should be used by default or not. # Some glibc targets used DFmode long double, but with glibc 2.4