aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/scripts/lib/devtool
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-03-31devtool: modify: call shutdown on tinfoil when donePaul Eggleton
Strictly speaking we ought to explicitly shut down a tinfoil instance when we're done with it. This doesn't affect modify's operation but is important if you want to be able to call into modify() from another plugin (though anyone doing so should be advised that the function is by no means a stable API and is subject to change in future releases). Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-03-23devtool: add: create git repository if URL specified as positional argumentPaul Eggleton
When we add from a fetched URL we are supposed to turn the resulting source tree into a git repository (if it isn't already one). However, we were using the older deprecated option name here instead of the positional argument, so "devtool add -f <url>" resulted in the repo being created but "devtool add <url>" didn't, which was wrong. Also update the oe-selftest tests to check that this worked. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-03-23devtool: add: delete externalsrc files on npm recipe do_installPaul Eggleton
The npm class just installs whatever is in ${S}; if you're using externalsrc in conjunction with it the symlinks (oe-workdir and oe-logs by default) plus singletask.lock will end up in the final package, which isn't really right. Introduce a variable so we know the path the files will be installed into within npm.bbclass, and append to do_install within the workspace bbappend to delete the files. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-03-23devtool: configure-help: fix error if do_configure not already runPaul Eggleton
The code here for running do_configure if it hadn't already been run was using the wrong string substitution parameters; fix it and test it. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-03-23devtool: sdk-install: add option to allow building from sourcePaul Eggleton
By default the sdk-install subcommand expects to restore the requested items from sstate and fails if it can't. If the user is OK with building from source, add a -s/--allow-build option to allow them to do that. In the process, ensure we show the status output while we're installing. Also add the missing header to the top of the file. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-03-20devtool: change config symlink name to .config.newMarkus Lehtonen
Otherwise (if the symlink is named .config) kernel build considers source tree as dirty and fails. [YOCTO #9270] Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-03-09recipetool: create: support creation of additional files by pluginsPaul Eggleton
Allow plugins to create additional files to go alongside the recipe. The plugins don't know what the output filename is going to be, so they need to put the files in a temporary location and add them to an "extrafiles" dict within extravalues where the destination filename is the key and the temporary path is the value. devtool add was also extended to ensure these files get moved in and preserved upon reset if they've been edited by the user. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-03-04devtool: add build-sdk subcommandPaul Eggleton
Add a build-sdk command which is only available within the extensible SDK that builds a derivative extensible SDK. The idea is recipes in the workspace become a part of the new SDK - for example, this allows taking a vendor provided SDK, adding a few libs and then producing a new SDK with those included. When normally building the extensible SDK, the workspace is excluded; here we need to copy into the new SDK (renaming it in the process); the recipes' task signatures become locked and thus the sources are no longer needed, so they are removed along with the workspace bbappends which would interfere with the locked signatures. Additionally we need to just copy the configuration files (i.e. local.conf and auto.conf) rather than filtering and appending to them since that work has already been done when constructing the original SDK. The extra sstate artifacts from workspace recipes are also determined and copied into the new SDK in minimal mode (on the assumption that you won't set up a new sstate mirror). This reuses some code from build-image, so that needed to be generalised to allow that. Implements [YOCTO #8892]. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-03-04devtool: build-image: rename modulePaul Eggleton
Hyphens aren't allowed in python identifiers, so you shouldn't use them in module names or they are more difficult to import. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-03-03sdk.py: Fix undefined variableJuro Bystricky
"sdk_update" uses a variable newsdk_path, which was never declared. This would cause the command: devtool sdk-update <poky-sdk-latest> to fail with an error: NameError: global name 'newsdk_path' is not defined The remedy is to declare newsdk_path as it was no doubt intended, corresponding to the argument specifying <poky-sdk-latest>. [YOCTO#9042] Signed-off-by: Juro Bystricky <juro.bystricky@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-28devtool: upgrade: print new recipe namePaul Eggleton
Make this consistent with "devtool add" so that the user knows where to find the new recipe. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-02-28devtool: upgrade: drop PR on upgradePaul Eggleton
The PR value should be reset to the default when upgrading, so we need to drop it from the newly created file. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-02-28devtool: upgrade: eliminate unnecessary datastore copyPaul Eggleton
We aren't modifying the datastore copy here, so we don't need a copy at all. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-02-28devtool: upgrade: fix several issues with extraction of new sourcePaul Eggleton
Fix several issues when extracting the new version source over the top of the old one (when the recipe is not fetching from a git repo): * Delete the old source first so we ensure files deleted in the new version are deleted. This also has the side-effect of fixing any issues where files aren't marked writeable in the old source and thus overwriting them failed (harfbuzz 1.1.3 contains such files). * Fix incorrect variable name in abspath statement that made it a no-op Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-02-28devtool: upgrade: fix constructing new branch from tarball releasesPaul Eggleton
When we do an upgrade from one tarball version to another we want to: 1) Check out the old version as a new branch 2) Record the changes between the old and new versions as a commit 3) Check out the old version with patches applied 4) Rebase that onto the new branch Where we went wrong was step #1 where instead we checked out the old version with patches applied as the new branch, which meant the rebase didn't do anything and any changes made by the patches to files still in the new version were wiped out. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-02-28devtool: upgrade: fix renaming of recipe if PV is not in namePaul Eggleton
If the actual value of PV isn't in the name of the recipe (for example, a git or svn recipe) there's no point trying to rename it. Additionally, we already have the original filename, there's no need to guess it - just pass it in. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-02-28devtool: upgrade: fix moving version-specific files directoryPaul Eggleton
We were trying to move this from the current directory instead of the path. Let's just use shutil.move() instead of shelling out to mv. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-02-28devtool: upgrade: fix version argument checkingPaul Eggleton
For recipes that specify SRCREV, the code here wasn't quite doing the right thing. If the recipe has a SRCREV then that needs changing on upgrade, so ensure that the user specifies it. If it doesn't, then it'll be "INVALID" not None since the former is the actual default, so handle that properly as well. Additionally an unset variable was being erroneously passed when raising the error about the version being the same leading to a traceback, so fix that as well. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-02-28devtool: upgrade: drop superfluous call to validate_pnPaul Eggleton
The recipename argument to devtool upgrade specifies an existing recipe, so by definition the name will be valid (or it won't exist) - we don't need to validate it ourselves, that's only needed for situations like in devtool add where we're creating a new recipe. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-02-28devtool: upgrade: make source tree path optionalPaul Eggleton
Make devtool upgrade consistent with devtool add/modify in defaulting to sources/<recipename> under the workspace if no source tree path is specified. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-02-28devtool: modify: fix source tree default name when mapping virtualsPaul Eggleton
If you for example ran devtool modify virtual/libusb0 without specifying a source tree path, the default was <workspace>/sources/virtual/libusb0 which isn't correct - it should be using the mapped name i.e. libusb-compat (in the default OE-Core configuration). Reorder some of the code to ensure that the mapped name is used. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-02-28devtool: add: tweak auto-determining name failure messagePaul Eggleton
As suggested by Khem Raj. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-02-28devtool: update-recipe: create config fragmentMarkus Lehtonen
Create config fragment if the user makes modifications to kernel config. User may change .config e.g. by directly editing it or by running the 'do_menuconfig' bitbake task. Devtool generates one monolithic fragment by simply doing a diff between .config and .config.baseline files in the source directory. If either of these files is missing, the config fragment is not gerenrated or updated. The output is a file, 'devtool-fragment.cfg' that gets added to SRC_URI in the recipe (as well as copied into the 'oe-local-files' directory if that is present in the source tree). ${S}/.config will be a symlink to ${B}/.config. We need to do this as devtool is not able to access ${B} because ${B} is set in a .bbappend in the workspace layer which is not parsed by devtool itself. [YOCTO #8999] Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-02-28devtool: sync: update kernel configMarkus Lehtonen
Copy kernel config is copied to the source directory at a later phase in _extract_source() so that it gets copied when devtool sync is done, too. Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-02-21devtool: modify: tweak help description for behaviour changePaul Eggleton
I should have adjusted this in OE-Core commit 80a44e52609a89d9ffe816181ae193af491c06ac where the behaviour changed. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-21devtool: deploy-target: preserve existing filesPaul Eggleton
If files would be overwritten by the deployment, preserve them in a separate location on the target so that they can be restored if you later run devtool undeploy-target. At the same time, also check for sufficient space before starting the operation so that we avoid potentially failing part way through. Fixes [YOCTO #8978]. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-21devtool: undeploy-target: support undeploying all recipesPaul Eggleton
If you want to put the target device back to exactly how it was before devtool deploy-target started poking things into it, then it would make things easier if you didn't have to figure out which recipes were deployed. Now that we have the list stored on the target we can determine this reliably, so add a -a/--all option to undeploy-target to undeploy everything that has been deployed. One of the side-effects of this is that the dry-run functionality for undeploy-target had to be reimplemented to actually run the script on the target, since we have no way of knowing what's been deployed from the host side. We don't need to do the same for deploy-target though since we know exactly which files will be deployed without referring to the target. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-21devtool: deploy-target: write deployed files list to targetPaul Eggleton
When running devtool deploy-target, we save a list of deployed files, and this list is used by devtool undeploy-target (or the next time deploy-target is run if the list is present, in case any files have been renamed or deleted since the first time). We were writing this file to the host, but it makes more sense to write the list to the target instead, so that if we for example swap in a different board, or switch hosts, things will work as expected. In order to do this properly we have to construct a shell script and ship it over to the target so we can run it. The manifest is written out to a hidden directory in the root (/.devtool). Fixes [YOCTO #7908]. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-21devtool: sdk-update: tweak command-line handling of updateserverPaul Eggleton
Get the default value for updateserver from the configuration file and show it in the help; also only make the parameter optional if it's specified. This means we can also drop the check in the function as argparse will then ensure it's specified if there's no config setting. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-21devtool: (un)deploy-target: add help descriptionsPaul Eggleton
Add a long description used when running --help on the specific command. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-21devtool: categorise and order subcommands in help outputPaul Eggleton
The listing of subcommands in the --help output for devtool was starting to get difficult to follow, with commands appearing in no particular order (due to some being in separate modules and the order of those modules being parsed). Logically grouping the subcommands as well as being able to exercise some control over the order of the subcommands and groups would help, if we do so without losing the dynamic nature of the list (i.e. that it comes from the plugins). Argparse provides no built-in way to handle this and really, really makes it a pain to add, but with some subclassing and hacking it's now possible, and can be extended by any plugin as desired. To put a subcommand into a group, all you need to do is specify a group= parameter in the call to subparsers.add_parser(). you can also specify an order= parameter to make the subcommand sort higher or lower in the list (higher order numbers appear first, so use negative numbers to force items to the end if that's what you want). To add a new group, use subparsers.add_subparser_group(), supplying the name, description and optionally an order number for the group itself (again, higher numbers appear first). Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-21devtool: update-recipe: don't show workspace recipe warning if no updatePaul Eggleton
If we didn't make any changes to the file then there's no point warning the user that we have done. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-21devtool: reset: fix preserving patches/other files next to recipesPaul Eggleton
If files had been created next to the recipe (for example devtool add, edit the source and commit and then devtool update-recipe), running devtool reset failed to preserve those files and gave an error due to trying to rmdir the directory containing them which wasn't empty. Fix the preservation of files in the "attic" directory properly so we catch anything under the directory for the recipe, and replicate the same structure in the attic directory rather than slightly flattening it as we were before. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-21devtool / recipetool: use common code for launching editorPaul Eggleton
Looking at Chris Larson's code for starting the user's editor for "recipetool newappend" it was slightly better than what I wrote for "devtool edit-recipe" in that it checks VISUAL as well as EDITOR and defaults to vi if neither are set, so break this out to its own function and call it from both places. The broken out version passes shell=True however in case it's a more complicated command rather than just a name of an executable. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-21devtool: minor fix for error messagePaul Eggleton
There is no -N/--name option for devtool, that's a recipetool option - with devtool you just specify the name as a positional argument. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-11devtool: add: fix adding from a local source directoryPaul Eggleton
Fix a regression introduced in in OE-Core revision aedfc5a5db1c4b2b80a36147c9a13b31764d91dd where specifying a local source tree without specifying a name resulted in a traceback. Fixes [YOCTO #9086]. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-11devtool: modify: make -x the default behaviourPaul Eggleton
It's going to be more common for users not to have the prepared source tree for a recipe already, so the default behaviour ought to be to extract it for them from the recipe. Change the default to extract (effectively making the -x option a no-op) and add a --no-extract/-n option to disable it. Later we can look at trying to be smart and reusing an existing source tree instead of erroring out if it exists; for now this is just the default reversal. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-11devtool: commit for extra tasks that modify source when extractingPaul Eggleton
When extracting source for a recipe, if there are additional custom tasks run that make changes to the source, create a commit in the generated git branch so they are contained. This is particularly useful for tasks that come before do_patch since otherwise the changes might get incorporated in the first applied patch, but otherwise it helps avoid the tree being dirty at any point. Fixes [YOCTO #7626]. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-02-06scripts/devtool: Add getVarFlag expand argumentRichard Purdie
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-01-26devtool: extract: use the correct datastore for builddirMarkus Lehtonen
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-01-26devtool: add configure-help subcommandPaul Eggleton
When you need to set EXTRA_OECONF for a recipe, you need to know what options the configure script actually supports; the configure script however is only accessible from within a devshell and (at least in the case of autotooled software fetched from an SCM repository) may not actually exist until do_configure has run. Thus, provide a "devtool configure-help" subcommand that runs the configure script for a recipe with --help and shows you the output through a pager (e.g. less), prefaced by a header describing the current options being specified. There is basic support for autotools, cmake and bare configure scripts. The cmake support is a little hacky since cmake doesn't really have a concise help option that lists user-defined knobs (without actually running through the configure process), however that being a design feature of cmake there's not much I can think of to do about that at the moment. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-01-26devtool: properly handle bb.build.FuncFailed when extracting sourcePaul Eggleton
When we run the tasks required to extract the source for a recipe (e.g. within "devtool modify" or "devtool extract") if one of those tasks fails you get a bb.build.FuncFailed exception; handle this properly so you don't see a traceback. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-01-26devtool: add: warn if modified recipe found in attic directoryPaul Eggleton
If a recipe generated by "devtool add" has been modified since then when you run "devtool reset", it will be moved into the "attic" subdirectory of the workspace in case those modifications need to be preserved. It seems natural that if those modifications were worth preserving we should warn the user if such a file exists when they run "devtool add" to create the same recipe again, so they can pick up where they left off if they want to. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-01-26devtool: build-image: allow specifying packages to add to imagePaul Eggleton
Provide an option to devtool build-image to specify the list of packages instead of taking the list of packages produced by recipes in the workspace. Sometimes you don't want all of these packages; other times you want to add more. This is the most immediate fix for [YOCTO #8855], though it is a little crude so I would like to provide better means of customising the image contents later. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-01-26devtool: move edit-recipe to a separate modulePaul Eggleton
standard.py is getting a bit large; move the "utility" commands to another module. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-01-22devtool / recipetool: support specifying a subdirectory within the fetched ↵Paul Eggleton
source Sometimes you don't want to build an entire project, just a subdirectory of it; add a --src-subdir option to make that easier. (We still look for a single subdirectory in what gets unpacked, e.g. what you might find within a tarball, so whatever you specify with this option is added onto the end of that.) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-01-22devtool: add sdk-install subcommandPaul Eggleton
Add the ability to install additional pre-built items (from shared state) into the extensible SDK. This can already be done implicitly by adding something to DEPENDS within a recipe you're working on and then running "devtool build", but it's useful to be able to explicitly install things particularly if you're using the extensible SDK as a traditional toolchain. Note that for this command to be useful you need to have SSTATE_MIRRORS set in your SDK configuration, and that mirror needs to be populated with sstate artifacts for recipes you wish to be able to install. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-01-22devtool: sdk-update: improve SDK update process robustnessPaul Eggleton
Make the following improvements to the SDK update process: * Use a manifest file with sha256sums to track files other than sstate and metadata that we need to update - e.g. conf files. This allows us to handle where files such as auto.conf may or may not be present, as well as the configuration changing without affecting task signatures - we still want the config files copied in that case rather than it saying nothing needs to be done. * Write the SSTATE_MIRRORS_append to site.conf rather than local.conf so that local.conf remains static (since we don't want to trigger an update every time). Also, If there is an SSTATE_MIRRORS value already set in the configuration we can skip this and assume it contains the needed packages. * Allow the update process to be run in any directory, don't assume we're already at the base of the SDK * Where practical, fetch remote files into a temporary location and then move them to the desired location at the end, to avoid a failed update leaving the SDK in a broken state. * Update all installed do_populate_sysroot / do_packagedata tasks instead of using the SDK targets. This ensures any item installed through dependencies after installation (e.g. when running "devtool build") won't go stale. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-01-22devtool: sdk-update: improve temp directory handlingPaul Eggleton
* Use tempfile.mkdtemp() instead of hardcoding temp dir * Set a variable early for the temp locked sigs file and use that everywhere * Delete the temp dir at the end Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2016-01-22devtool: build: ensure pkgdata is written outPaul Eggleton
When you run devtool build, you need to have the pkgdata written out at the end, so that if what you're adding is a library and the next thing you add is something that depends on that library, the necessary information to map the dependency back to the recipe is present. In practical terms all this means is we need do_packagedata to run in addition to do_populate_sysroot. This does mean that do_package needs to run which wasn't running before, and that means that the few package QA tests that run within do_package such as installed-vs-shipped will now be run. This may be a bit bothersome, and prompted a fix for one of our oe-selftest tests as a result, but I don't see an easy way around it. Ultimately if you care about using the recipe in an image you'll need to fix any such errors anyway. Fixes [YOCTO #8887]. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>