| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Upgrade from the latest snapshot to a recent git revision.
Without this xvideo does not work on skylake: Backporting the
specific fixes turned out to be too complex.
Remove patches that are in upstream already, rebase
disable-x11-dri3.patch.
Fixes [YOCTO #10041]
Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukkonen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add patch to pack systray icons so that their drawing area is the
size they expect (otherwise GtkStatusIcon based systray items can
end up drawing "tiled", looking like 1.5 icons instead of a single
icon).
Fixes [YOCTO #9995]
Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukkonen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The aim of the original commit was to make connman-gnome load the icons
at the exact size of the systray. There are two problems with this:
* There are not enough icon sizes provided to make the scaling
look good at most sizes (including current panel size)
* Both connman-gnome and mb-panel have bugs in the icon size update
code and using scaling to exact size makes these much more visible
(See bug 9995 for example).
The problems the original commit tried to fix can be worked around
with better packing in matchbox-panel-2.
Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukkonen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
There doesn't appear to be any reason to keep this dependency on ncurses in
attr, so remove it.
This reverts commit 7c474dc3d65bb3f71b375d36d81959cb405be80a.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If no /etc/localtime (or /etc/TZ for uclibc) is found, then the libc
will default to UTC, so setting UTC as a fallback default via the TZ
environment variable is redundant.
Since having the TZ environment variable set causes /etc/localtime
to be ignored, it can cause confusion if /etc/localtime is added
interactively after /etc/profile has been run.
Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The following poky commit:
4359ef08 base.bbclass: Use bb.fatal() instead of raising FuncFailed
changed the way the fetcher error is reported.
Previous reporting:
...Function failed: Fetcher failure for URL:...
New reporting:
...Fetcher failure for URL:...
Updating how the check is done fixes the test error and accurately
confirms the tested scenario for test_invalid_recipe_src_uri.
[YOCTO #10370]
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Esquivel <benjamin.esquivel@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Boost is an optional dependency but avoid build non-determinism by adding it as
DEPENDS. It is only for the shared pointer types so can be disabled explicitly
if required.
Turn sqlite into a PACKAGECONFIG.
Add a patch for the "monitor" feature to control the optional dependencies on
ncurses and json-c. Previously this was enabled for target only but enable it
everwhere now that json-c is available for native/nativesdk.
Of course all of this was predicated about systemtap needing systemtap-native to
be built, but it turns out that this dependency is due to oe-core 507bd2 which
adds systemtap-native as DEPENDS for convenience. Remove this dependency, if
the user wants systemtap-native then they can build it explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 1fe8e0f074c [include/uapi/linux/if_tunnel.h: include linux/if.h, linux/ip.h and linux/in6.h]
breaks the builds of net-tools.
We remove the new includes until such a time that userspace can adapt to the
new kernel headers.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Before standard/intel/* was created in the 4.1 and 4.4 kernel trees,
some patches were merged to standard/base to add features/support for
intel platforms.
While this isn't entirely bad, there have been some compile issues
reported in some configurations. Since we don't need these commits
on standard/base, we can relocate them to make standard/base upstream
clean.
This commit removes those patches from standard/base, and restores
then to the standard/intel/* branches.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The following kernel commits broke the compilation of ppp, due to redefined
structures.
Nothing else breaks in userspace with or without these uapi changes, so we
revert them to keep everything building.
commit 05ee5de7451796cf9a8aeb2f05a57790d4fd2336
Author: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@iki.fi>
Date: Mon Aug 22 20:32:42 2016 +0200
include/uapi/linux/if_pppol2tp.h: include linux/in.h and linux/in6.h
Fixes userspace compilation errors like:
error: field <E2><80><98>addr<E2><80><99> has incomplete type
struct sockaddr_in addr; /* IP address and port to send to */
^
error: field <E2><80><98>addr<E2><80><99> has incomplete type
struct sockaddr_in6 addr; /* IP address and port to send to */
Signed-off-by: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
commit eafe92114308acf14e45c6c3d154a5dad5523d1a
Author: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@iki.fi>
Date: Mon Aug 22 20:32:43 2016 +0200
include/uapi/linux/if_pppox.h: include linux/in.h and linux/in6.h
Fixes userspace compilation errors:
error: field <E2><80><98>addr<E2><80><99> has incomplete type
struct sockaddr_in addr; /* IP address and port to send to */
error: field <E2><80><98>addr<E2><80><99> has incomplete type
struct sockaddr_in6 addr; /* IP address and port to send to */
Signed-off-by: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We've been using a -rc4 variant of the libc-headers, now that
4.8 has been released, we switch to the final tgz of the headers.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Updating the common-pc* configuration to have the following mmc
configs available by default:
meta/common-pc-64: use mmc-sdhci feature
meta/common-pc: use mmc-sdhci feature
meta: add mmc/mmc-sdhci feature
meta: add mmc/mmc-block feature
meta: add mmc/base feature
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We don't autoreconf/libtoolize binutils as it has very strict requirements, so
extend our patching of the stock libtool to include two fixes to RPATH
behaviour, as part of the solution to ensure that native binaries don't have
RPATHs pointing at the host system's /usr/lib.
This generally doesn't cause a problem but it can cause some binaries (such as
ar) to abort on startup:
./x86_64-pokysdk-linux-ar: relocation error: /usr/lib/libc.so.6: symbol
_dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with
link time reference
The situation here is that ar is built and as it links to the host libc/loader
has an RPATH for /usr/lib. If tmp is wiped and then binutils is installed from
sstate relocation occurs and the loader changed to the sysroot, but there
remains a RPATH for /usr/lib. This means that the sysroot loader is used with
the host libc, which can be incompatible. By telling libtool that the host
library paths are in the default search path, and ensuring that all default
search paths are not added as RPATHs by libtool, the result is a binary that
links to what it should be linking to and nothing else.
[ YOCTO #9287 ]
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
There was a clear typo in a function name, correct it.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This variable is used by libtool to know what paths are on the default loader
search path. As we have modified loader paths, native.bbclass can tell libtool
that both the sysroot libdir and the host library paths are searched, so no
RPATHs for those will be generated.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This variable is used by libtool to know what paths are on the default loader
search path. As we have modified loader paths, cross.bbclass can tell libtool
that both the sysroot libdir and the host library paths are searched, so no
RPATHs for those will be generated.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When switching MACHINE, nativeksdk recipes could end up being rebuilt. Clear
ABIEXTENSION to avoid this problem and ensure sstate checksum consistency.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Switching between multilib configurations should not change allarch recipe
or nativesdk checksums. Add a new sstate test for this based on the standard
allarch test.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When building boost-native on i686, the x86 override isn't applied
unless the target also happens to be x86. Similarly the x86_64 override
is only applied on 64 bit target machines.
Avoid various problems by removing the new problematic configure options
in the native case.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
gcc-cross target recipes should not depend on SDK_SYS but started to
after recent changes. Remove the dependency to stop this (its caused
by shared code in do_install). The compiler names contain SDK_SYS
so changes would be correctly handled via other means.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When enabling multilib.conf, the world was rebuilding due to changes in the
pkg-config search path. This doesn't matter so exclude it from the checksums.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When changing multilibs, allarch recipes should not be rebuilding. This
adds enough variable exclusions to make this work properly. Future
regressions will be prevented with new testing.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
package_write_rpm references the MULTILIBS variable and the checksums
of nativesdk recipes were changing as a result of this.
We don't need/want MULTILIBS values for nativesdk so disable this.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
StreamHandler was added due missing log information on the console in
oe-selftest with Qemu Runner
Signed-off-by: Francisco Pedraza <francisco.j.pedraza.gonzalez@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
Jussi Kukkonen
Ross Burton
Andre McCurdy
Benjamin Esquivel
Bruce Ashfield
Ulf Magnusson
Richard Purdie
Francisco Pedraza