| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
* Remove 5 backported patches
* Refresh patches to remove fuzz warnings
Signed-off-by: Mingli Yu <Mingli.Yu@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Drop upstreamed patch for gcc5 compatibility
Forward port x32 patch
(From OE-Core rev: 2782ae4dfb417ba377f861283792d7d9929f2ae3)
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add a patch for fix build in x32 ABI, the fail is cause by time_t
printf because time_t is long int in x64 and long long int in x32.
[YOCTO #7422]
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
|
Mingli Yu
Ross Burton
Khem Raj
Aníbal Limón