aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta/recipes-devtools/run-postinsts/run-postinsts_1.0.bb
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-04-18run-postinsts: Replace pi_dir variable testNiko Mauno
Since commit 5159ddcb62682e1b7e63a20a9218ea96e3fe10a2 string length test performed against pi_dir has effectively never been able to succeed. Change this to rather test if pi_dir is not an existing directory. By doing we remove the chance of seeing the following console error message during first boot to a pristine rootfs: 'ls: /etc/ipk-postinsts: No such file or directory' Signed-off-by: Niko Mauno <niko.mauno@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2016-10-28Remove $COREBASE/LICENSE from LIC_FILES_CHKSUMOlaf Mandel
Several recipes reference the LICENSE file in their LIC_FILES_CHKSUM variable as ${COREBASE}/LICENSE. This forces distribution providers to keep this file verbatim or to overload the affected recipes. The section "Moving to the Yocto Project 1.6 Release" in the Yocto manual suggests removing the LICENSE file where possible. Remove LICENSE in cases where COPYING.MIT is also given and replace LICENSE with COPYING.MIT if the former was the only entry. All modified recipes specify LICENSE = "MIT" and none of the in-tree files specify a different license either. As the packages do not change (the license files are not contained in them), do not increase PR. Signed-off-by: Olaf Mandel <o.mandel@menlosystems.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2015-07-31run-postinsts: use ${localstatedir} instead of hardcoding /var/libAndré Draszik
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
2015-01-23meta: set proper S valuePetter Mabäcker
After removal of auto-creating S we must ensure that all recipes are using a proper value for S. Fix all recipes that only need to set S equals to WORKDIR. [YOCTO #5627] Signed-off-by: Petter Mabäcker <petter@technux.se>
2014-03-27run-postinsts: fix issue with checking IMAGE_FEATURESLaurentiu Palcu
The old implementation was wrong. It was not very generic and it checked IMAGE_FEATURES while building the recipe, which led to various issues with the generation of the final script. That is, the run-postinsts script was generated once, while building the package for the first time. Hence, any other changes to IMAGE_FEATURES, like removing/adding 'package-management' did not reflect in the final script. This commit makes run-postinsts script autodetect the backend used for creating the image, making it generic. [YOCTO #5666] [YOCTO #5972] Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2014-03-07run-postinsts: use it for opkg/dpkg tooLaurentiu Palcu
Currently, opkg/dpkg have their own postinstalls that create a run-postinsts script which is run at first boot. This commit prepares the run-postinsts recipe/script to be used by opkg/dpkg when DISTRO_FEATURES includes package-management. [YOCTO #5666] Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2014-01-28run-postinsts: Add systemd service fileRoss Burton
This patch mainly adds a systmd service file for run-postinsts, which is started at first boot to run the post-install scripts. Apart from this, this patch also modifies the installation location of run-postinsts to ${sbindir}. This is because this script would be used by both sysvinit and systemd based images. So it's more reasonable to make it locate under ${sbindir}. [YOCTO #5719] Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
2014-01-02Update after toplevel LICENSE file checksum changeRichard Purdie
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2014-01-02Replace one-line DESCRIPTION with SUMMARYPaul Eggleton
A lot of our recipes had short one-line DESCRIPTION values and no SUMMARY value set. In this case it's much better to just set SUMMARY since DESCRIPTION is defaulted from SUMMARY anyway and then the SUMMARY is at least useful. I also took the opportunity to fix up a lot of the new SUMMARY values, making them concisely explain the function of the recipe / package where possible. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
2013-09-06run-postinsts: move script execution from S98 to S99 in rcS.dLaurentiu Palcu
Apparently, when opkg/dpkg and run-postinsts are installed in the same time, opkg/dpkg postinstall overwrites the run-postinsts link in rcS.d. This will make run-postinsts script useless and the delayed postinstalls will not be run. This issue happens only when 'package-management' is disabled and, in the same time, dpkg/opkg ends up in the image: either pulled by some dependency or manually installed. With this patch, both opkg/dpkg and run-postinsts scripts will run but the former will silently fail because the package metadata is removed from the image since 'pacakge-management' is disabled. [YOCTO #4484] Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-06-10run-postinsts: make it genericLaurentiu Palcu
This recipe is used only when the package manager is not deployed on target and there still are delayed postinstalls that need to be run on target. At the moment, run-postinsts is targeted to dpkg/opkg. RPM uses another recipe, called rpm-postinsts which, in turn, is used even when the rpm package is deployed. This patch intends to make run-postinsts generic and deprecate rpm-postinsts. Here's why: * when opkg/dpkg are not deplyed, the meta-data files are useless. Hence, the awk script is not needed. The postinstall files are already saved in /etc/(deb|ipk)-postinsts directory and we can use the same procedure as in rpm's case; Also, the recipe is moved out from meta/recipes-devel/dpkg to meta/recipes-devel/run-postinsts. Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>