| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When the original problem was fixed in gnulib the
patches were rebased on top of the upstream fix...
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
add patch 0001-test-getopt-posix-fix.patch for fix test-getopt-posix
Signed-off-by: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
exposed by glibc 2.28 for details see
https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gnulib/2018-03/msg00000.html
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
These are recipes where the upstream has moved to GPLv3 and these old
versions are the last ones under the GPLv2 license.
There are several reasons for making this move. There is a different
quality of service with these recipes in that they don't get security
fixes and upstream no longer care about them, in fact they're actively
hostile against people using old versions. The recipes tend to need a
different kind of maintenance to work with changes in the wider ecosystem
and there needs to be isolation between changes made in the v3 versions
and those in the v2 versions.
There are probably better ways to handle a "non-GPLv3" system but right
now having these in OE-Core makes them look like a first class citizen
when I believe they have potential for a variety of undesireable issues.
Moving them into a separate layer makes their different needs clearer, it
also makes it clear how many of these there are. Some are probably not
needed (e.g. mc), I also wonder whether some are useful (e.g. gmp)
since most things that use them are GPLv3 only already. Someone could
now more clearly see how to streamline the list of recipes here.
I'm proposing we mmove to this separate layer for 2.3 with its future
maintinership and testing to be determined in 2.4 and beyond.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Rebased remove-gets.patch.
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Fix a variety of problems such as typos, bad punctuations, or incorrect
Upstream-Status values.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This is same gnulib fix replicated across needed recipes
Change-Id: I756713407111a726eae98e26c9c1ff64981371c0
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Refreshed remove-gets.patch to apply correctly and changed license
checksum since some years were added to the license file.
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
|
|
These recipes use gnulib which needs this change to use gets
when its defined and not otherwise. Until that change goes into
gnulib and then all these package upgrade gnulib in their sourcebase
we patch them
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
gcc: update upstream-status for patches
python: update upstream-status for patches
libtool: update upstream-status of patches
m4: update upstream status for patches
eglibc: remove unused patches
eglibc: update upstream status of patches
glibc: update upstream-status of patches & remove unused patches
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
|
|
Note: Downgrading of m4 would require rebuilding of the autoconf
Fixed circular depedency with the newer autoconf
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
|
|
Having one monolithic packages directory makes it hard to find things
and is generally overwhelming. This commit splits it into several
logical sections roughly based on function, recipes.txt gives more
information about the classifications used.
The opportunity is also used to switch from "packages" to "recipes"
as used in OpenEmbedded as the term "packages" can be confusing to
people and has many different meanings.
Not all recipes have been classified yet, this is just a first pass
at separating things out. Some packages are moved to meta-extras as
they're no longer actively used or maintained.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
Adrian Bunk
Ross Burton
Changqing Li
Khem Raj
Richard Purdie
Robert Yang
Laurentiu Palcu
Nitin A Kamble
Richard Purdie