| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Fixed:
WARNING: attr-2.4.47-r0 do_package_write_tar: Task do_package_tar changed cwd to /path/to/attr/2.4.47-r0/packages-split/attr-locale-sv
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Add "mips" and "mipsel" to "machdata" table.
Although there is a way to add entries to the "machdata" table
from a BSP without modifying the insane.bbclass directly, MIPS is
already supported in poky and as such the relevant entries should be
present in insane.bbclass.
Signed-off-by: Juro Bystricky <juro.bystricky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Both "arc" and "xtensa" are valid Linux architectures, add
them into valid_archs table.
Signed-off-by: Juro Bystricky <juro.bystricky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
It's possible - albeit unlikely - that gdk-pixbuf isn't present in the sysroot
when a recipe inheriting this class is and the sysroot is finalised.
One example would be if the sstate archive has librsvg but not gdk-pixbuf:
librsvg will be extracted from the sstate but gdk-pixbuf will be built to "fill
in the gap". In this situation the setscene completion hook installed by
pixbufcache.bbclass will attempt to execute gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders, but that
binary hasn't been installed by gdk-pixbuf yet.
Also add gdk-pixbuf-native to DEPENDS in native builds to ensure that the
binaries we expect will be present, as it's possible to build loaders without
linking to GdkPixbuf.
[ YOCTO #10420 ]
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
Since the move to put image deployment under sstate control in
d54339d4b1a7e884de636f6325ca60409ebd95ff old images are automatically
removed before a new image is deployed (the default behaviour of the
sstate logic).
RM_OLD_IMAGE is therefore no longer required to provide this
behaviour, remove the variable and its users.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
|
|
If the user modifies files such as CMakeLists.txt in the case of cmake,
we want do_configure to re-run so that those changes can take effect. In
order to accomplish that, have a variable CONFIGURE_FILES which
specifies a list of files that will be put into do_configure's checksum
(either full paths, or just filenames which will be searched for in the
entire source tree). CONFIGURE_FILES then just needs to be set
appropriately depending on what do_configure is doing; for now I've set
this for autotools and cmake which are the most common cases.
Fixes [YOCTO #7617].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We need to ignore the return code from the init script 'stop' command in
the preinst and prerm scriptlets. Otherwise package upgrade or
deinstallation (at least when opkg is used) is likely to fail if the
daemon is not running. That is because an init script possibly returns
'1' if you try to stop a service that is not running which, in turn,
causes the scriptlet to fail which, in turn, causes the package
(de-)installation to fail.
[YOCTO #10299]
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The 'arch' QA test currently simply outputs the ELF machine field as a number
which isn't helpful. Display this as a human-readable name to make it clearer
to the user what the problem is.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The source archiver was not handling the gcc-source target correctly, since it uses the
work-shared directory, we don't want to unpack and patch it twice, just as the comments
say, but the code was not there to check for the gcc-source target.
[YOCTO #10265]
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
It's not uncommon for qemumips[64] builds on the Yocto Project
autobuilder to fail during Sanity Tests after a very long timeout
period. This is due to the MIPS emulation in QEMU being slow and
some of the build tests taking a very long time on MIPS machines.
This patch works around this slowness by disabling the more
complex build tests for QEMU MIPS machines.
[YOCTO #10340]
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Check that the init script that is going to be called in the prerm()
script really exists and is executable. There might be a packaging bug
or the script might've been removed already earlier in prerm().
[YOCTO #10299]
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The Yocto Project Eclipse plugin requires that runqemu and unfsd are
accessible within the SDK, and indeed the standard SDK has these. This
turns out to be fairly easy to do - we just need to add unfsd and symlink
it, runqemu and a few other scripts into the SDK's bin directory.
Fixes [YOCTO #10214].
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This class allow the extlinux.conf generation for U-Boot use.
The U-Boot support for it is given to allow the Generic Distribution
Configuration specification use by OpenEmbedded-based products.
This class can be inherited by u-boot recipes to create extlinux.conf
and boot using menu options.
U-boot with extlinux support is machine dependent, so to use this class
you need to set UBOOT_EXTLINUX to 1 in machine configuration file and
also set root= kernel cmdline UBOOT_EXTLINUX_ROOT. This variable is used
to pass root kernel cmdline, e.g:
UBOOT_EXTLINUX_ROOT = "root=/dev/mmcblk2p2"
Signed-off-by: Fabio Berton <fabio.berton@ossystems.com.br>
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[YOCTO #10389]
Use a glob (*) to match all mips (not previously matched). This will ensure
that the linuxloader is properly returned for mips, mipsel, mips64,
mips64el and their n32 variants.
See: https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/ABIList#mips for the official list
of loaders.
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add support for MIPS Release 6 ISA
Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add support for MIPS Release 6 ISA. The loader is located at a
new place for multiarch.
For more details, check https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch
and https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/ABIList#mips
Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add support for MIPS Release 6 ISA
Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add support for MIPS Release 6 ISA
Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add support for MIPS release 6 of the ISA
Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If attempting to patch a git repo without a proper git config setup,
an error will occur saying user.name/user.email are needed by git
am/apply. After some code was removed from kernel-yocto, it was
simple enough to reproduce this error by creating a kernel patch and
using a container to build.
This patch abstracts out functionality that existed in buildhistory
for use in other classes. It also adds a call to this functionality
to the kernel-yocto class.
Fixes [YOCTO #10346]
introduced in OE-core revision
0f698dfd1c8bbc0d53ae7977e26685a7a3df52a3
Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola <stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
* otherwise there is a lot of warnings about missing close on file descriptor
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
PACKAGE_EXCLUDE_COMPLEMENTARY
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The checkstatus function fires an event to notify bitbake UI about
the progress of the task, this function is implemented using ThreadPool
and is causing event lose when multiple threads tries to fire an event
(writes over socket/fd).
[YOCTO #10330]
Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
perceived complexity and cargo culting.
Motivating quote below:
< kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and
funcfailed was what you'd catch if you were calling
exec_func/exec_task. that is, it's what those functions
raise, not what metadata functions should be raising
< kergoth> it didn't end up being used that way
< kergoth> but there's really never a reason to raise it yourself
FuncFailed.__init__ takes a 'name' argument rather than a 'msg'
argument, which also shows that the original purpose got lost.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This variable is used by libtool to know what paths are on the default loader
search path. As we have modified loader paths, native.bbclass can tell libtool
that both the sysroot libdir and the host library paths are searched, so no
RPATHs for those will be generated.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This variable is used by libtool to know what paths are on the default loader
search path. As we have modified loader paths, cross.bbclass can tell libtool
that both the sysroot libdir and the host library paths are searched, so no
RPATHs for those will be generated.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When changing multilibs, allarch recipes should not be rebuilding. This
adds enough variable exclusions to make this work properly. Future
regressions will be prevented with new testing.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
package_write_rpm references the MULTILIBS variable and the checksums
of nativesdk recipes were changing as a result of this.
We don't need/want MULTILIBS values for nativesdk so disable this.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This begins moving away from the deprecated subprocess calls in an
effort to eventually move to some more global abstraction using the run
convenience method provided in python 3.5.
[ YOCTO #9342 ]
Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola <stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
Robert Yang
Juro Bystricky
Ross Burton
Joshua Lock
Paul Eggleton
Markus Lehtonen
Saul Wold
Fabio Berton
Mark Hatle
Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel
Stephano Cetola
Martin Jansa
Peter Kjellerstedt
Aníbal Limón
Ulf Magnusson
Richard Purdie