diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0011-Do-not-require-that-ELF-binaries-are-executable-to-b.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0011-Do-not-require-that-ELF-binaries-are-executable-to-b.patch | 32 |
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0011-Do-not-require-that-ELF-binaries-are-executable-to-b.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0011-Do-not-require-that-ELF-binaries-are-executable-to-b.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..c910a478ee --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0011-Do-not-require-that-ELF-binaries-are-executable-to-b.patch @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +From d65d6e8760afbd7f70b22a1f3297a037bc475fea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Peter Kjellerstedt <pkj@axis.com> +Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 10:21:08 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH 11/13] Do not require that ELF binaries are executable to be + identifiable + +There is nothing that requires, e.g., a DSO to be executable, but it +is still an ELF binary and should be identified as such. + +Upstream probably expects all ELF binaries to be marked as executable, +but rather than imposing such a limitation for OE, allow any file to +be identified as an ELF binary regardless of whether it is executable +or not. + +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate +Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com> +--- + fileattrs/elf.attr | 1 - + 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) + +diff --git a/fileattrs/elf.attr b/fileattrs/elf.attr +index 595b33e09..bac52649d 100644 +--- a/fileattrs/elf.attr ++++ b/fileattrs/elf.attr +@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ + %__elf_provides %{_rpmconfigdir}/elfdeps --provides %{?__filter_GLIBC_PRIVATE:--filter-private} + %__elf_requires %{_rpmconfigdir}/elfdeps --requires %{?__filter_GLIBC_PRIVATE:--filter-private} + %__elf_magic ^(setuid )?(setgid )?(sticky )?ELF (32|64)-bit.*$ +-%__elf_flags exeonly +-- +2.12.0 + |