aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg')
-rw-r--r--meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/fix_installorder.patch174
-rw-r--r--meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/offline_postinstall.patch57
-rw-r--r--meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/offlineroot_varname.patch20
3 files changed, 251 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/fix_installorder.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/fix_installorder.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e782ce738d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/fix_installorder.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+There is a problem with dependency order when installing packages. The key
+problem revolves around the satisfy_dependencies_for() function which is
+called from opkg_install_pkg just before the installation (and preinst)
+happens.
+
+The satisfy_dependencies_for() function calls pkg_hash_fetch_unsatisfied_dependencies()
+which will only return packages which were previously not marked as
+*going* to be installed at some point. For the purposes of
+opkg_install_pkg() we really need to know which dependencies haven't been
+installed yet.
+
+This patch adds pkg_hash_fetch_satisfied_dependencies() which returns a
+list of package dependencies. We can then directly check the status of
+these and ensure any hard dependencies (not suggestions or recommendations)
+are installed before returning.
+
+Consider the situation (where -> means 'depends on'):
+
+X -> A,E
+A -> B,E
+E -> B
+B -> C
+
+Currently X would install A and E. When installing A the packages B, E
+and C would be marked as "to install". When the package B is considered
+the second time (as a dependency of E rather than A), it would install
+straight away even though C was not currently installed, just marked
+as needing to be installed.
+
+The patch changes the behaviour so B can't install until C really is installed.
+
+This change is required to run the postinst scripts in the correct order.
+
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+
+RP 2011/12/15
+
+Index: trunk/libopkg/opkg_install.c
+===================================================================
+--- trunk.orig/libopkg/opkg_install.c 2011-12-15 15:58:39.000000000 +0000
++++ trunk/libopkg/opkg_install.c 2011-12-15 15:58:41.838334788 +0000
+@@ -76,6 +77,27 @@
+ }
+
+ if (ndepends <= 0) {
++ pkg_vec_free(depends);
++ depends = pkg_hash_fetch_satisfied_dependencies(pkg);
++
++ for (i = 0; i < depends->len; i++) {
++ dep = depends->pkgs[i];
++ /* The package was uninstalled when we started, but another
++ dep earlier in this loop may have depended on it and pulled
++ it in, so check first. */
++ if ((dep->state_status != SS_INSTALLED) && (dep->state_status != SS_UNPACKED)) {
++ opkg_msg(DEBUG2,"Calling opkg_install_pkg.\n");
++ err = opkg_install_pkg(dep, 0);
++ /* mark this package as having been automatically installed to
++ * satisfy a dependancy */
++ dep->auto_installed = 1;
++ if (err) {
++ pkg_vec_free(depends);
++ return err;
++ }
++ }
++ }
++
+ pkg_vec_free(depends);
+ return 0;
+ }
+Index: trunk/libopkg/pkg_depends.c
+===================================================================
+--- trunk.orig/libopkg/pkg_depends.c 2010-12-22 16:04:43.000000000 +0000
++++ trunk/libopkg/pkg_depends.c 2011-12-15 15:58:41.838334788 +0000
+@@ -259,6 +259,88 @@
+ return unsatisfied->len;
+ }
+
++
++pkg_vec_t *
++pkg_hash_fetch_satisfied_dependencies(pkg_t * pkg)
++{
++ pkg_vec_t *satisfiers;
++ int i, j, k;
++ int count;
++ abstract_pkg_t * ab_pkg;
++
++ satisfiers = pkg_vec_alloc();
++
++ /*
++ * this is a setup to check for redundant/cyclic dependency checks,
++ * which are marked at the abstract_pkg level
++ */
++ if (!(ab_pkg = pkg->parent)) {
++ opkg_msg(ERROR, "Internal error, with pkg %s.\n", pkg->name);
++ return satisfiers;
++ }
++
++ count = pkg->pre_depends_count + pkg->depends_count + pkg->recommends_count + pkg->suggests_count;
++ if (!count)
++ return satisfiers;
++
++ /* foreach dependency */
++ for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
++ compound_depend_t * compound_depend = &pkg->depends[i];
++ depend_t ** possible_satisfiers = compound_depend->possibilities;;
++
++ if (compound_depend->type == RECOMMEND || compound_depend->type == SUGGEST)
++ continue;
++
++ if (compound_depend->type == GREEDY_DEPEND) {
++ /* foreach possible satisfier */
++ for (j = 0; j < compound_depend->possibility_count; j++) {
++ /* foreach provided_by, which includes the abstract_pkg itself */
++ abstract_pkg_t *abpkg = possible_satisfiers[j]->pkg;
++ abstract_pkg_vec_t *ab_provider_vec = abpkg->provided_by;
++ int nposs = ab_provider_vec->len;
++ abstract_pkg_t **ab_providers = ab_provider_vec->pkgs;
++ int l;
++ for (l = 0; l < nposs; l++) {
++ pkg_vec_t *test_vec = ab_providers[l]->pkgs;
++ /* if no depends on this one, try the first package that Provides this one */
++ if (!test_vec){ /* no pkg_vec hooked up to the abstract_pkg! (need another feed?) */
++ continue;
++ }
++
++ /* cruise this possiblity's pkg_vec looking for an installed version */
++ for (k = 0; k < test_vec->len; k++) {
++ pkg_t *pkg_scout = test_vec->pkgs[k];
++ /* not installed, and not already known about? */
++ if (pkg_scout->state_want == SW_INSTALL && pkg_scout != pkg)
++ pkg_vec_insert(satisfiers, pkg_scout);
++ }
++ }
++ }
++
++ continue;
++ }
++
++ /* foreach possible satisfier, look for installed package */
++ for (j = 0; j < compound_depend->possibility_count; j++) {
++ /* foreach provided_by, which includes the abstract_pkg itself */
++ depend_t *dependence_to_satisfy = possible_satisfiers[j];
++ abstract_pkg_t *satisfying_apkg = possible_satisfiers[j]->pkg;
++ pkg_t *satisfying_pkg =
++ pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate(satisfying_apkg,
++ pkg_installed_and_constraint_satisfied,
++ dependence_to_satisfy, 1);
++ /* Being that I can't test constraing in pkg_hash, I will test it here */
++ if (satisfying_pkg != NULL && satisfying_pkg != pkg) {
++ if (pkg_constraint_satisfied(satisfying_pkg, dependence_to_satisfy) && satisfying_pkg->state_want == SW_INSTALL)
++ pkg_vec_insert(satisfiers, satisfying_pkg);
++ }
++
++ }
++ }
++ return satisfiers;
++}
++
++
+ /*checking for conflicts !in replaces
+ If a packages conflicts with another but is also replacing it, I should not consider it a
+ really conflicts
+Index: trunk/libopkg/pkg_depends.h
+===================================================================
+--- trunk.orig/libopkg/pkg_depends.h 2010-12-22 16:04:43.000000000 +0000
++++ trunk/libopkg/pkg_depends.h 2011-12-15 15:58:41.838334788 +0000
+@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@
+ void buildDependedUponBy(pkg_t * pkg, abstract_pkg_t * ab_pkg);
+ int version_constraints_satisfied(depend_t * depends, pkg_t * pkg);
+ int pkg_hash_fetch_unsatisfied_dependencies(pkg_t * pkg, pkg_vec_t *depends, char *** unresolved);
++pkg_vec_t * pkg_hash_fetch_satisfied_dependencies(pkg_t * pkg);
+ pkg_vec_t * pkg_hash_fetch_conflicts(pkg_t * pkg);
+ int pkg_dependence_satisfiable(depend_t *depend);
+ int pkg_dependence_satisfied(depend_t *depend);
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/offline_postinstall.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/offline_postinstall.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b197f6b731
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/offline_postinstall.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+When we have an offline root and have specified force-postinstall,
+attempt to run the postinstall but if it fails, just leave it in the
+status file as neeing to run. We can issue a NOTICE this is happened
+but supress errors. This means the OE class doesn't have to do any
+further post processing of the postinstalls itself.
+
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+
+RP 2011/12/15
+
+
+Index: trunk/libopkg/pkg.c
+===================================================================
+--- trunk.orig/libopkg/pkg.c 2011-12-15 15:58:39.000000000 +0000
++++ trunk/libopkg/pkg.c 2011-12-15 20:04:50.109992736 +0000
+@@ -1297,8 +1297,9 @@
+ free(cmd);
+
+ if (err) {
+- opkg_msg(ERROR, "package \"%s\" %s script returned status %d.\n",
+- pkg->name, script, err);
++ if (!conf->offline_root)
++ opkg_msg(ERROR, "package \"%s\" %s script returned status %d.\n",
++ pkg->name, script, err);
+ return err;
+ }
+
+Index: trunk/libopkg/opkg_cmd.c
+===================================================================
+--- trunk.orig/libopkg/opkg_cmd.c 2011-12-15 19:49:25.826014150 +0000
++++ trunk/libopkg/opkg_cmd.c 2011-12-15 19:50:52.346012148 +0000
+@@ -453,7 +453,8 @@
+ pkg->state_flag &= ~SF_PREFER;
+ opkg_state_changed++;
+ } else {
+- err = -1;
++ if (!conf->offline_root)
++ err = -1;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+Index: trunk/libopkg/opkg_configure.c
+===================================================================
+--- trunk.orig/libopkg/opkg_configure.c 2011-12-15 19:50:11.586013081 +0000
++++ trunk/libopkg/opkg_configure.c 2011-12-15 19:52:15.082010347 +0000
+@@ -35,7 +35,10 @@
+
+ err = pkg_run_script(pkg, "postinst", "configure");
+ if (err) {
+- opkg_msg(ERROR, "%s.postinst returned %d.\n", pkg->name, err);
++ if (!conf->offline_root)
++ opkg_msg(ERROR, "%s.postinst returned %d.\n", pkg->name, err);
++ else
++ opkg_msg(NOTICE, "%s.postinst returned %d, marking as unpacked only, configuration required on target.\n", pkg->name, err);
+ return err;
+ }
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/offlineroot_varname.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/offlineroot_varname.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a67f389bac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/offlineroot_varname.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+OE uses D as the offline install directory in its scripts, not PKG_ROOT.
+
+Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [OE specific usage]
+
+RP 2011/12/15
+
+Index: trunk/libopkg/pkg.c
+===================================================================
+--- trunk.orig/libopkg/pkg.c 2011-12-15 15:58:39.000000000 +0000
++++ trunk/libopkg/pkg.c 2011-12-15 20:04:50.109992736 +0000
+@@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@
+
+ opkg_msg(INFO, "Running script %s.\n", path);
+
+- setenv("PKG_ROOT",
++ setenv("D",
+ pkg->dest ? pkg->dest->root_dir : conf->default_dest->root_dir, 1);
+
+ if (! file_exists(path)) {
+