gcc: Remove csl gcc recipes

sourcery toolchain is available as external pluggable toolchain
if needed.

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 97 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-csl-arm/gcc_optab_arm.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-csl-arm/gcc_optab_arm.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 5738a470ff..0000000000
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-csl-arm/gcc_optab_arm.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,97 +0,0 @@
-Upstream-Status: Pending
-
-ARM is the only architecture that has a helper function that returns
-an unbiased result. This fix is trivial enough that we can show it
-doesn't effect any of the other arches. Can we consider this a
-regression fix since it used to work until the helper was added :}
-
-Tested with no regressions on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and arm-none-eabi.
-
-Cheers,
-Carlos.
--- 
-Carlos O'Donell
-CodeSourcery
-carlos@codesourcery.com
-(650) 331-3385 x716
-
-gcc/
-
-2006-01-27  Carlos O'Donell  <carlos@codesourcery.com>
-
-	* optabs.c (prepare_cmp_insn): If unbaised and unsigned then bias
-	the comparison routine return.
-	
-gcc/testsuite/
-
-2006-01-27  Carlos O'Donell  <carlos@codesourcery.com>
-
-	* gcc.dg/unsigned-long-compare.c: New test.
-
-Index: gcc/optabs.c
-===================================================================
---- 1/gcc/optabs.c	(revision 110300)
-+++ 2/gcc/optabs.c	(working copy)
-@@ -3711,18 +3711,24 @@
-       result = emit_library_call_value (libfunc, NULL_RTX, LCT_CONST_MAKE_BLOCK,
- 					word_mode, 2, x, mode, y, mode);
- 
-+      /* There are two kinds of comparison routines. Biased routines
-+	 return 0/1/2, and unbiased routines return -1/0/1. Other parts
-+	 of gcc expect that the comparison operation is equivalent
-+	 to the modified comparison. For signed comparisons compare the 
-+	 result against 1 in the unbiased case, and zero in the biased
-+	 case. For unsigned comparisons always compare against 1 after
-+	 biasing the unbased result by adding 1. This gives us a way to
-+	 represent LTU. */
-       *px = result;
-       *pmode = word_mode;
--      if (TARGET_LIB_INT_CMP_BIASED)
--	/* Integer comparison returns a result that must be compared
--	   against 1, so that even if we do an unsigned compare
--	   afterward, there is still a value that can represent the
--	   result "less than".  */
--	*py = const1_rtx;
--      else
-+      *py = const1_rtx;
-+
-+      if (!TARGET_LIB_INT_CMP_BIASED)
- 	{
--	  *py = const0_rtx;
--	  *punsignedp = 1;
-+	  if (*punsignedp)
-+	    *px = plus_constant (result, 1);  
-+	  else
-+	    *py = const0_rtx;
- 	}
-       return;
-     }
-Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unsigned-long-compare.c
-===================================================================
---- 1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unsigned-long-compare.c	(revision 0)
-+++ 2/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unsigned-long-compare.c	(revision 0)
-@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
-+/* Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. */
-+/* Contributed by Carlos O'Donell on 2006-01-27 */
-+
-+/* Test a division corner case where the expression simplifies
-+   to a comparison, and the optab expansion is wrong. The optab 
-+   expansion emits a function whose return is unbiased and needs
-+   adjustment. */
-+/* Origin: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@codesourcery.com> */
-+/* { dg-do run { target arm-*-*eabi* } } */
-+/* { dg-options "" } */
-+#include <stdlib.h>
-+
-+#define BIG_CONSTANT 0xFFFFFFFF80000000ULL
-+
-+int main (void)
-+{
-+  unsigned long long OneULL = 1ULL;
-+  unsigned long long result;
-+
-+  result = OneULL / BIG_CONSTANT; 
-+  if (result)
-+    abort ();
-+  exit (0);
-+}