blob: dcbe01d5ed5142bb9392ac41e24d08cbc2f09aa7 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
|
From d4f73b037d11d20f080e74c05df28853fb833075 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 22:59:47 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Do not set Wno-unused-but-set-variable
This is gcc specific warning, not implemented by pretending to be gcc
like compilers e.g. clang.
We will pass this option from recipe
Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [OE-Specific]
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
m4/compiler_warnings.m4 | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/m4/compiler_warnings.m4 b/m4/compiler_warnings.m4
index f498a28..e65e97f 100644
--- a/m4/compiler_warnings.m4
+++ b/m4/compiler_warnings.m4
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ if test "$GCC" = "yes" -a "$set_more_warnings" != "no"; then
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wstrict-prototypes \
-Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare \
-Wno-deprecated-declarations \
- -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wformat-security; do
+ -Wno-unused -Wformat-security; do
SAVE_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $option"
AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether gcc understands $option])
|
